Hybrid Classical-Quantum Generative Algorithms for Financial Modelling and Prediction
Quantum machine learning (QML) is a cross-disciplinary subject made up of two of the most exciting research areas: quantum computing and classical machine learning (ML), with ML and artificial intelligence (AI) being projected as the first fields that will be impacted by the rise of quantum machines. Quantum computers are being used today in drug discovery, material & molecular modelling and finance. In this work, we explore emerging research areas in the application of hybrid classical quantum machine learning (QML) in finance. We focus on hybrid classical-quantum models that have gained significant interest in the financial world for various applications. We utilise a real-world cryptocurrency dataset to train a quantum generative adversarial networks (qGAN), and implement the real-life NVIDIA stock price data on quantum LSTM (QLSTM), comparing its performance with classical Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) model. Additionally, we investigate the application of quantum circuit Born machine (QCBM) using a toy dataset for applications in finance. For the qGAN, we define quantum circuits for generators and showcase the potential for future quantum advantage in finance through QML, possibly in combination with QLSTM and QCBM. Our findings suggest that, while training classical data is more efficient on LSTM, the test predictions of QLSTM is slightly superior to its classical counterpart making it a promising candidate for financial forecasting and analysis for timeseries type data.
Authors
- Dimitrios Makris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6170-0236)
- Santanu Ganguly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0141-9228)
- Xing Liang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7853-8133)
Institutions
- Kingston University London (GB)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-02-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ic363308.2025.10956507
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.96