Sentiment Analysis on Biodegradable Trash Bags Using a Fine-Tuned BERT Model

Biodegradable trash bags provide an eco-friendly alternative to traditional plastic bags, but their effectiveness and consumer perception remain under-explored. This study aims to analyze customer sentiment toward biodegradable trash bags using customer reviews. 949 reviews were collected and subjected to comprehensive data preprocessing techniques, including text cleaning, tokenization, stopword removal, and lemmatization. Initial sentiment analysis was conducted using the pre-trained BERT model "distilbert-base-uncased-finetuned-sst-2-english". To enhance sentiment classification accuracy, the model was fine-tuned with domain-specific data. Reviews with ratings below 4 were labeled as negative, while those with ratings of 4 and above were labeled as positive. The fine-tuned BERT model achieved an 85.37% accuracy in sentiment classification, improving from the baseline performance of the pre-trained model. Our sentiment analysis on 949 Amazon reviews revealed that 675 reviews (71%) were positive, while 274 reviews (29%) were negative. These findings provide valuable insights for manufacturers, marketers, and policymakers, helping them understand consumer concerns and preferences better. This, in turn, can guide product improvements and more effective marketing strategies to promote the adoption of biodegradable trash bags.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isriti64779.2024.10963622
Primary Topic
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentiment Analysis on Biodegradable Trash Bags Using a Fine-Tuned BERT Model

Margareth Setiawan, Ivan Diryana Sudirman
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
article

Sentiment Analysis on Biodegradable Trash Bags Using a Fine-Tuned BERT Model

Margareth Setiawan, Ivan Diryana Sudirman
article en

Abstract

Biodegradable trash bags provide an eco-friendly alternative to traditional plastic bags, but their effectiveness and consumer perception remain under-explored. This study aims to analyze customer sentiment toward biodegradable trash bags using customer reviews. 949 reviews were collected and subjected to comprehensive data preprocessing techniques, including text cleaning, tokenization, stopword removal, and lemmatization. Initial sentiment analysis was conducted using the pre-trained BERT model "distilbert-base-uncased-finetuned-sst-2-english". To enhance sentiment classification accuracy, the model was fine-tuned with domain-specific data. Reviews with ratings below 4 were labeled as negative, while those with ratings of 4 and above were labeled as positive. The fine-tuned BERT model achieved an 85.37% accuracy in sentiment classification, improving from the baseline performance of the pre-trained model. Our sentiment analysis on 949 Amazon reviews revealed that 675 reviews (71%) were positive, while 274 reviews (29%) were negative. These findings provide valuable insights for manufacturers, marketers, and policymakers, helping them understand consumer concerns and preferences better. This, in turn, can guide product improvements and more effective marketing strategies to promote the adoption of biodegradable trash bags.

Binus University (ID)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sentiment Analysis on Biodegradable Trash Bags Using a Fine-Tuned BERT Model — Margareth Setiawan, Ivan Diryana Sudirman · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS