Comparison of the Performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Architectures in Detecting Pneumonia with Chest X-ray Image Data

Acute lung infections called pneumonia are caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi, which cause inflammation of the air sacs and pleural effusion. To prevent pneumonia, early detection is needed to reduce the death rate due to pneumonia. This research compares the performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models such as ResNet50, MobileNetV2, DenseNet169, EfficientNet-B0, and Xception when using chest x-ray data to detect pneumonia. The research begins with data collection, image preprocessing, model training, testing, validation, and model evaluation. This study used 5,856 chest X-ray images that were classified as pneumonia and normal. The results show that MobileNetV2 is the best of all models with a training accuracy of 0.91%, testing accuracy of 0.88%, and validation accuracy of 0.93%. DenseNet ranked second with training accuracy of 0.91%, measurement accuracy of 0.88%, and validation accuracy of 0.81%. Third, Xception is in third place with training accuracy of 0.90%, testing accuracy of 0.86%, and validation accuracy of 0.81%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isriti64779.2024.10963386
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Architectures in Detecting Pneumonia with Chest X-ray Image Data

Shofwatul Uyun, Irma Eryanti Putri
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

Comparison of the Performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Architectures in Detecting Pneumonia with Chest X-ray Image Data

Shofwatul Uyun, Irma Eryanti Putri
article en

Abstract

Acute lung infections called pneumonia are caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi, which cause inflammation of the air sacs and pleural effusion. To prevent pneumonia, early detection is needed to reduce the death rate due to pneumonia. This research compares the performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models such as ResNet50, MobileNetV2, DenseNet169, EfficientNet-B0, and Xception when using chest x-ray data to detect pneumonia. The research begins with data collection, image preprocessing, model training, testing, validation, and model evaluation. This study used 5,856 chest X-ray images that were classified as pneumonia and normal. The results show that MobileNetV2 is the best of all models with a training accuracy of 0.91%, testing accuracy of 0.88%, and validation accuracy of 0.93%. DenseNet ranked second with training accuracy of 0.91%, measurement accuracy of 0.88%, and validation accuracy of 0.81%. Third, Xception is in third place with training accuracy of 0.90%, testing accuracy of 0.86%, and validation accuracy of 0.81%.

Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of the Performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Architectures in Detecting Pneumonia with Chest X-ray Image Data — Shofwatul Uyun, Irma Eryanti Putri · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS