Introducing “Validated entheses-Based reconstruction of activity 2.0” (VERA 2.0): Semi-automated 3D analysis of bone surface changes

In archaeological sciences, the macroscopic morphology of distinct dry bone structures, such as tubercles, ridges, epicondyles, and fossae, is routinely used to infer habitual activity patterns in past human populations, extinct hominins, and other animals. This study introduces "Validated Entheses-based Reconstruction of Activity 2.0" (VERA 2.0), a new method for precisely quantifying 3D surface irregularities on enthesis-bearing bone structures. Building on VERA 1.0, first introduced by the same author in 2016 and later named in a 2021 literature review, VERA 2.0 enhances the previous approach by incorporating a semi-automated image segmentation technique that reduces manual input while maintaining accuracy. The method involves selecting a predefined broad bone surface region, after which an algorithm automatically detects subtle surface irregularities (see example video in the step-by-step protocol at dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl82z8dl2w/v3). Validation analyses confirm VERA 2.0's precision and reliability for activity reconstruction through intra- and inter-observer repeatability tests, experimental research comparing activity and control laboratory specimens, and analyses of historical human skeletons with extensively detailed long-term occupational data. Moreover, while this anthropological 3D measuring protocol paper cannot and does not aim to analyze the anatomical and histological nature of bone surface irregularities, preliminary anatomical dissection and virtual analysis of a cadaveric thumb enthesis suggest a possible association with attaching muscles and ligaments. Future anatomical and histological research aiming to explore soft-hard tissue interactions could clarify how these identified surface changes exactly relate to the attaching tissues. Overall, VERA 2.0 provides a robust, efficient quantitative tool for inferring activity patterns from skeletal remains, with applications across paleontological, paleoanthropological, and bioarchaeological contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321479
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
66.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introducing “Validated entheses-Based reconstruction of activity 2.0” (VERA 2.0): Semi-automated 3D analysis of bone surface changes

Fotios Alexandros Karakostis
8 citations
PLoS ONE
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
66.18
article

Introducing “Validated entheses-Based reconstruction of activity 2.0” (VERA 2.0): Semi-automated 3D analysis of bone surface changes

Fotios Alexandros Karakostis
article en
8 citations

Abstract

In archaeological sciences, the macroscopic morphology of distinct dry bone structures, such as tubercles, ridges, epicondyles, and fossae, is routinely used to infer habitual activity patterns in past human populations, extinct hominins, and other animals. This study introduces "Validated Entheses-based Reconstruction of Activity 2.0" (VERA 2.0), a new method for precisely quantifying 3D surface irregularities on enthesis-bearing bone structures. Building on VERA 1.0, first introduced by the same author in 2016 and later named in a 2021 literature review, VERA 2.0 enhances the previous approach by incorporating a semi-automated image segmentation technique that reduces manual input while maintaining accuracy. The method involves selecting a predefined broad bone surface region, after which an algorithm automatically detects subtle surface irregularities (see example video in the step-by-step protocol at dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl82z8dl2w/v3). Validation analyses confirm VERA 2.0's precision and reliability for activity reconstruction through intra- and inter-observer repeatability tests, experimental research comparing activity and control laboratory specimens, and analyses of historical human skeletons with extensively detailed long-term occupational data. Moreover, while this anthropological 3D measuring protocol paper cannot and does not aim to analyze the anatomical and histological nature of bone surface irregularities, preliminary anatomical dissection and virtual analysis of a cadaveric thumb enthesis suggest a possible association with attaching muscles and ligaments. Future anatomical and histological research aiming to explore soft-hard tissue interactions could clarify how these identified surface changes exactly relate to the attaching tissues. Overall, VERA 2.0 provides a robust, efficient quantitative tool for inferring activity patterns from skeletal remains, with applications across paleontological, paleoanthropological, and bioarchaeological contexts.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(4)
University of Basel (CH), Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
66.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.