Personal is political: A critical study on the autobiographical paradigm shift with reference to Sudha Murthy’s writings

The Traditional Humanist Paradigm perceives literature as an ahistorical and apolitical entity to be examined. The above premise is supported by Eliot’s (1982) notion of depersonalisation, which states that the personal in any literary writing must be subjugated. The advancement of theory tries to analyse literature as discourse, which consists of numerous levels of reality that contribute to multidimensional truth perspectives. This poses a challenge for language as a way of constructing Reality, as all truths are simply partial representations. Postmodernism subverts the act of canonisation in literature, making personal writings such as autobiographies and memoirs a forum for discussion. Apart from that, it fundamentally challenges the concept of universality, viewing literature as a re-presentation of race, ethnicity, caste, class, gender, and the period in which it was produced. Among these re-presentations, autobiographical writing is gaining traction, indicating a transition from personal narrative to political and subsequently to politicise. As a relevant frame, this study will trace this transformation through Sudha Murthy’s JRD’s words inspired me in philanthropy and few other writings. The relevance of the personal-political link will be highlighted as a result.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Linguistics Culture and FLT
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46687/loco7508
Primary Topic
Indian History and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal is political: A critical study on the autobiographical paradigm shift with reference to Sudha Murthy’s writings

Anderleen Diana Lazarus, G. Akil Raj
Studies in Linguistics Culture and FLT
Indian History and Philosophy
article

Personal is political: A critical study on the autobiographical paradigm shift with reference to Sudha Murthy’s writings

Anderleen Diana Lazarus, G. Akil Raj
article en

Abstract

The Traditional Humanist Paradigm perceives literature as an ahistorical and apolitical entity to be examined. The above premise is supported by Eliot’s (1982) notion of depersonalisation, which states that the personal in any literary writing must be subjugated. The advancement of theory tries to analyse literature as discourse, which consists of numerous levels of reality that contribute to multidimensional truth perspectives. This poses a challenge for language as a way of constructing Reality, as all truths are simply partial representations. Postmodernism subverts the act of canonisation in literature, making personal writings such as autobiographies and memoirs a forum for discussion. Apart from that, it fundamentally challenges the concept of universality, viewing literature as a re-presentation of race, ethnicity, caste, class, gender, and the period in which it was produced. Among these re-presentations, autobiographical writing is gaining traction, indicating a transition from personal narrative to political and subsequently to politicise. As a relevant frame, this study will trace this transformation through Sudha Murthy’s JRD’s words inspired me in philanthropy and few other writings. The relevance of the personal-political link will be highlighted as a result.

Studies in Linguistics Culture and FLTVol. 13(1)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Indian History and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.