Fostering a ‘Human with AI’ approach for evaluating students’ writing in English

With the increasing interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) within academia, Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) has gained significant traction. However, its full impact on writing skills remains a topic of contention. This paper examines how AI-based feedback helps undergraduate students overcome challenges they encounter when they write essays as part of their university studies. A text-oriented approach to writing evaluation was adopted to demonstrate how Grammarly was utilized to screen and score a sample of 22 short essays (11,050 words). In addition to assigning numerical scores to the essays, Grammarly provided student writers with detailed feedback, including error reports that were subsequently analyzed. Then, two focus group discussions were administered to shed more light on Grammarly-based evaluation. Findings showed that AWE encourages learners to observe their errors and refine their essays accordingly before submitting them to teachers for scoring. Nevertheless, such a tool per se is short to provide a thorough evaluation. It could be used in tandem with peer review and teachers’ evaluation. The paper closes on some implications and suggestions to foreground AWE in academic writing courses besides, but not a surrogate to, human raters’ feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Linguistics Culture and FLT
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46687/vfbz9792
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fostering a ‘Human with AI’ approach for evaluating students’ writing in English

Abdu Al-Kadi
1 citations
Studies in Linguistics Culture and FLT
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

Fostering a ‘Human with AI’ approach for evaluating students’ writing in English

Abdu Al-Kadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the increasing interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) within academia, Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) has gained significant traction. However, its full impact on writing skills remains a topic of contention. This paper examines how AI-based feedback helps undergraduate students overcome challenges they encounter when they write essays as part of their university studies. A text-oriented approach to writing evaluation was adopted to demonstrate how Grammarly was utilized to screen and score a sample of 22 short essays (11,050 words). In addition to assigning numerical scores to the essays, Grammarly provided student writers with detailed feedback, including error reports that were subsequently analyzed. Then, two focus group discussions were administered to shed more light on Grammarly-based evaluation. Findings showed that AWE encourages learners to observe their errors and refine their essays accordingly before submitting them to teachers for scoring. Nevertheless, such a tool per se is short to provide a thorough evaluation. It could be used in tandem with peer review and teachers’ evaluation. The paper closes on some implications and suggestions to foreground AWE in academic writing courses besides, but not a surrogate to, human raters’ feedback.

Studies in Linguistics Culture and FLTVol. 13(1)
University of Bergen (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.