Generative Ai In Higher Education: Philosophical, Sociological, And Pedagogical Perspectives

Recent breakthroughs in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have transformed higher education, offering new possibilities for personalized learning and assessment. This paper explores GenAI's impacts on education, focusing on business programs as early adopters while extending to broader humanities contexts. We examine GenAI's potential to enhance learning through adaptive systems and real-time feedback, while addressing ethical dilemmas including algorithmic biases, equity gaps, and academic integrity concerns. From philosophical and sociological perspectives, we investigate how GenAI challenges traditional notions of knowledge production, authenticity, and human agency in education. The paper proposes an integrative framework for responsible GenAI implementation that balances technological capabilities with human-centered pedagogy through contextual adoption, ethical reflexivity, and redefined evaluation metrics. We recommend assessment redesigns that validate authentic learning and encourage a posthuman perspective that reimagines AI as collaborator rather than tool, offering productive pathways for future educational practice while preserving essential human elements of interpretation, ethics, and relational capacity

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Arts Humanities & Social Science
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56734/ijahss.v6n4a6
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative Ai In Higher Education: Philosophical, Sociological, And Pedagogical Perspectives

Rich Yueh
International Journal of Arts Humanities & Social Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Generative Ai In Higher Education: Philosophical, Sociological, And Pedagogical Perspectives

Rich Yueh
article en

Abstract

Recent breakthroughs in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have transformed higher education, offering new possibilities for personalized learning and assessment. This paper explores GenAI's impacts on education, focusing on business programs as early adopters while extending to broader humanities contexts. We examine GenAI's potential to enhance learning through adaptive systems and real-time feedback, while addressing ethical dilemmas including algorithmic biases, equity gaps, and academic integrity concerns. From philosophical and sociological perspectives, we investigate how GenAI challenges traditional notions of knowledge production, authenticity, and human agency in education. The paper proposes an integrative framework for responsible GenAI implementation that balances technological capabilities with human-centered pedagogy through contextual adoption, ethical reflexivity, and redefined evaluation metrics. We recommend assessment redesigns that validate authentic learning and encourage a posthuman perspective that reimagines AI as collaborator rather than tool, offering productive pathways for future educational practice while preserving essential human elements of interpretation, ethics, and relational capacity

International Journal of Arts Humanities & Social ScienceVol. 06(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.