Effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in menstrually-related migraine: The unmet need of perimenstrual headache days

BackgroundData on the effectiveness of preventive treatments on menstrually-related migraine (MRM) is scarce. Our objective was to analyze the efficacy of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) in the reduction of perimenstrual headache days (PHD) and perimenstrual migraine days (PMD) compared to non-perimenstrual headache days (non-PHD) and non-perimenstrual migraine days (non-PMD) per month in women with MRM.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted including females with menstruation and headache records, treated with either anti-CGRP mAbs or BTX-A. Patients completed e-Diary one month before and three months after preventive treatment. We collected clinical data and analyzed PHD/PMD and non-PHD/non-PMD before and after treatment. Additional analyses included PHD/PMD and non-PHD/non-PMD comparisons grouped by aura, episodic/chronic migraine, treatment and contraceptive intake.ResultsWe analyzed data from 113 females with a median (range) age of 39.0 (33.0-45.0) years. When combining patients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs or BTX-A, a median (range) of 2.0 (2.0-3.0) PHD/month (corresponding to 13.6% baseline monthly headache days (MHD)) and 13.0 (9.0-17.0) non-PHD/month pre-treatment was observed. From these, 2.0 (1.0-3.0) were PMD/month, and 7.0 (4.0-11.0) were non-PMD/month. After treatment, the median PHD/month was 2.0 (1.0-3.0) (corresponding to 16.67% of MHD) (<i>p</i> = 0.085), and 8.0 (5.0-13.0) were non-PHD/month (<i>p</i> < 0.001); from these, 1.0 (0.0-3.0) were PMD/month (proportion difference, <i>p</i> = 0.035) and 4.0 (2.0-7.0) were non-PMD (proportion difference, <i>p</i> < 0.001). When analyzing grouped by treatment, only patients treated with anti-CGRP experienced a reduction in PMD. No statistically significant differences in clinical factors (aura, migraine diagnosis, contraceptive intake) between PHD/non-PHD or PMD/non-PMD, either pre- or post-treatment. A higher probability risk of headache and migraine during the perimenstrual window was observed independently of the treatment received (odds ratio = 1.637, 95% confidence interval = 1.356-1.984, <i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionsThree-month treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs or BTX-A effectively reduced non-PHD and non-PMD but had limited effect on PHD/PMD because headache probability risk was higher during the perimenstrual window after treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cephalalgia
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251332519
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in menstrually-related migraine: The unmet need of perimenstrual headache days

Victor J Gallardo, Alicia Alpuente, Patricia Pozo‐Rosich, Marta Torres‐Ferrús et al.
4 citations
Cephalalgia
Migraine and Headache Studies
5.88
article

Effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in menstrually-related migraine: The unmet need of perimenstrual headache days

Victor J Gallardo, Alicia Alpuente, Patricia Pozo‐Rosich, Marta Torres‐Ferrús, Edoardo Caronna, Laura Gómez‐Dabó, Rut Mas-de-les-Valls
article en
4 citations

Abstract

BackgroundData on the effectiveness of preventive treatments on menstrually-related migraine (MRM) is scarce. Our objective was to analyze the efficacy of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) in the reduction of perimenstrual headache days (PHD) and perimenstrual migraine days (PMD) compared to non-perimenstrual headache days (non-PHD) and non-perimenstrual migraine days (non-PMD) per month in women with MRM.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted including females with menstruation and headache records, treated with either anti-CGRP mAbs or BTX-A. Patients completed e-Diary one month before and three months after preventive treatment. We collected clinical data and analyzed PHD/PMD and non-PHD/non-PMD before and after treatment. Additional analyses included PHD/PMD and non-PHD/non-PMD comparisons grouped by aura, episodic/chronic migraine, treatment and contraceptive intake.ResultsWe analyzed data from 113 females with a median (range) age of 39.0 (33.0-45.0) years. When combining patients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs or BTX-A, a median (range) of 2.0 (2.0-3.0) PHD/month (corresponding to 13.6% baseline monthly headache days (MHD)) and 13.0 (9.0-17.0) non-PHD/month pre-treatment was observed. From these, 2.0 (1.0-3.0) were PMD/month, and 7.0 (4.0-11.0) were non-PMD/month. After treatment, the median PHD/month was 2.0 (1.0-3.0) (corresponding to 16.67% of MHD) (<i>p</i> = 0.085), and 8.0 (5.0-13.0) were non-PHD/month (<i>p</i> < 0.001); from these, 1.0 (0.0-3.0) were PMD/month (proportion difference, <i>p</i> = 0.035) and 4.0 (2.0-7.0) were non-PMD (proportion difference, <i>p</i> < 0.001). When analyzing grouped by treatment, only patients treated with anti-CGRP experienced a reduction in PMD. No statistically significant differences in clinical factors (aura, migraine diagnosis, contraceptive intake) between PHD/non-PHD or PMD/non-PMD, either pre- or post-treatment. A higher probability risk of headache and migraine during the perimenstrual window was observed independently of the treatment received (odds ratio = 1.637, 95% confidence interval = 1.356-1.984, <i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionsThree-month treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs or BTX-A effectively reduced non-PHD and non-PMD but had limited effect on PHD/PMD because headache probability risk was higher during the perimenstrual window after treatment.

CephalalgiaVol. 45(4)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migraine and Headache Studies
5.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.