User requirements for quantitative radiological reports in multiple sclerosis

Question A lack of consensus on essential features for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging reports limits their integration into multiple sclerosis management. Findings This study identified key preferences, including detailed lesion information, specific brain and spinal cord measurements, and rigorous validation for effective quantitative reports. Clinical relevance This study identified essential features and barriers for implementing quantitative radiological reports in multiple sclerosis management, aiming to enhance clinical workflows, improve disease monitoring, and ultimately provide better, data-driven care for patients through tailored imaging solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11544-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

User requirements for quantitative radiological reports in multiple sclerosis

Bas Jasperse, Olga Ciccarelli, Jaume Sastre‐Garriga, Eva M. M. Strijbis et al.
5 citations
European Radiology
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
7.36
article

User requirements for quantitative radiological reports in multiple sclerosis

Bas Jasperse, Olga Ciccarelli, Jaume Sastre‐Garriga, Eva M. M. Strijbis, Giuseppe Pontillo, Joost P.A. Kuijer, Bastiaan Moraal, Ferrán Prados, Zoe Mendelsohn, Len Bos, Àlex Rovira, Frederik Barkhof, Hugo Vrenken, Rozemarijn M. Mattiesing, Menno Michiel Schoonheim, Joep Killestein, David Rudolf van Nederpelt, Tarek Yousry
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Question A lack of consensus on essential features for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging reports limits their integration into multiple sclerosis management. Findings This study identified key preferences, including detailed lesion information, specific brain and spinal cord measurements, and rigorous validation for effective quantitative reports. Clinical relevance This study identified essential features and barriers for implementing quantitative radiological reports in multiple sclerosis management, aiming to enhance clinical workflows, improve disease monitoring, and ultimately provide better, data-driven care for patients through tailored imaging solutions.

European RadiologyVol. 35(10)
University of Siena (IT), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Basel (CH), Medical University of Graz (AT), Multiple Sclerosis Society (GB), University Hospital of Basel (CH), University of Oxford (GB), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), UCL Biomedical Research Centre (GB), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), Carlo Forlanini Hospital (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), University College London (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Biogen, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Celgene, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Fondation pour l'Aide à la Recherche sur la Sclérose en Plaques, European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Prothena, Health~Holland, Atara Biotherapeutics, Celltrion, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Guarantors of Brain, University College London, Bayer HealthCare, ZonMw, Eisai, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, H. Lundbeck A/S, MedDay Pharmaceuticals, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Sanofi Genzyme, Eurostars
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
7.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.