CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS VERSUS EMERGENCY APPENDECTOMY: A RAPID SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Introduction: Currently, increasing scientific evidence suggests that perforation is not an inevitable outcome of appendiceal obstruction. Over the past 25 years, the scientific literature has increasingly demonstrated the safety of non-operative treatment of Acute Appendicitis (AA) with antibiotics. Method: This study is a rapid systematic literature review. Studies were extracted from the PubMed databases of the National Library of Medicine, EMBASE, SCIELO, and the Virtual Health Library (VHL). Only randomized controlled clinical trials comparing conservative treatment with antibiotics to urgent surgical treatment in adults over 18 years old with uncomplicated acute appendicitis were included. Results: This meta-analysis found an effectiveness of 83.8% (95% CI: 87.99% - 78.17%) for surgical treatment and a global effectiveness rate of 68.77% (95% CI: 65.20% - 72.53%) for the conservative management of uncomplicated AA, increasing to 75.20% (95% CI: 71.50% - 79.09%) after sensitivity analysis excluding articles with a high risk of bias. Conclusion: Conservative treatment with antibiotics is safe and associated with lower risks of complications; however, it is significantly less effective than appendectomy in adults with uncomplicated AA without appendicolith.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aracê.
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n4-175
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS VERSUS EMERGENCY APPENDECTOMY: A RAPID SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Daniel Vieira de Oliveira, Rita de Cássia Almeida Vieira, Valdinaldo Aragão de Melo, Bruno Ferreira Amorim
Aracê.
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS VERSUS EMERGENCY APPENDECTOMY: A RAPID SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Daniel Vieira de Oliveira, Rita de Cássia Almeida Vieira, Valdinaldo Aragão de Melo, Bruno Ferreira Amorim
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Currently, increasing scientific evidence suggests that perforation is not an inevitable outcome of appendiceal obstruction. Over the past 25 years, the scientific literature has increasingly demonstrated the safety of non-operative treatment of Acute Appendicitis (AA) with antibiotics. Method: This study is a rapid systematic literature review. Studies were extracted from the PubMed databases of the National Library of Medicine, EMBASE, SCIELO, and the Virtual Health Library (VHL). Only randomized controlled clinical trials comparing conservative treatment with antibiotics to urgent surgical treatment in adults over 18 years old with uncomplicated acute appendicitis were included. Results: This meta-analysis found an effectiveness of 83.8% (95% CI: 87.99% - 78.17%) for surgical treatment and a global effectiveness rate of 68.77% (95% CI: 65.20% - 72.53%) for the conservative management of uncomplicated AA, increasing to 75.20% (95% CI: 71.50% - 79.09%) after sensitivity analysis excluding articles with a high risk of bias. Conclusion: Conservative treatment with antibiotics is safe and associated with lower risks of complications; however, it is significantly less effective than appendectomy in adults with uncomplicated AA without appendicolith.

Aracê.Vol. 7(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.