Applying the kim and kim model to institutional repository management in academic libraries, southwest Nigeria

Evaluating institutional repositories (IR) management is challenging. Various indicators used by authors often result in incomplete assessments and persistent operational issues. This study employed a mixed-method approach, combining a descriptive survey design, structured questionnaires, and in-depth interviews to apply the Kim and Kim IR Evaluation Model in managing IRs in academic libraries in Southwest Nigeria. The study involved 352 library personnel from 14 university libraries and their librarians. All personnel and librarians formed the sample size due to the low population. Data collection included a structured 30-item questionnaire based on the Kim and Kim Model dimensions—content, policy (slightly modified), system and network, and use, user, and submitter—and an interview guide. Ten librarians participated in interviews, while four were unreachable. Of 352 distributed questionnaires, 298 were returned, and 246 valid responses (70% return rate) were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Interview data were thematically analysed. Findings revealed that content, system and network, policy, and use/user/submitter dimensions significantly influenced IR management. However, challenges such as low submission rates, lack of deterrents for non-submission, and language barriers for non-English speakers were noted. The study recommends fostering a culture of active participation through mandatory submission policies and continuous policy development.