Extending genomic prediction to future climates through crop modelling. A case study on heading time in barley

• We integrated crop models and genomics to extend prediction to unknown environments. • Barley heading date recorded in a wide range of conditions was used as a case study . • Prediction accuracy was good for test genotypes in unknown environments. • Large G × E × M interactions were found when extending prediction to future climates. • This approach can support plant breeding targeting adaptation to climate change . Integrating genomic prediction (GP) and biophysical crop models has the potential to support plant breeding in defining adapting strategies to climate change. However, whether this integrated approach can actually broaden the prediction domain to unexplored environments is still unclear. We showed how crop models can extend GP to new environments and capture genotype-specific response to future climate conditions. Days to heading (HD) in spring barley was used as a case study, given the primary role of phenology for crop adaptation. Phenotypic and genomic (50 K Illumina SNP array) data for 151 two-row genotypes were used, with HD determined on 17 site × season combinations spread from the Mediterranean basin to Northern Europe. A dedicated modelling solution was developed by integrating approaches from the WARM and WOFOST crop models, with optimization algorithms used to derive accession-specific values of most relevant model parameters. GP was carried out on the model parameters with the R package rr-BLUP, and the resulting markers-derived parameters were used to simulate heading date with the crop model explicitly reproducing G × E × M interactions. Prediction accuracy for unknown genotypes was evaluated through ten-fold cross validation, whereas the capability of crop models to extend GP to unexplored environments was evaluated with a leave-one site-out cross validation. Results were encouraging, with average R 2 , RMSE and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency for unknown genotypes in unexplored environments equal to 0.97, 9.27, and 0.94, respectively. Accession-specific HD under future climates (20 seasons centred on 2060 generated for the IPSL-CM6A-LR realization of SSP3–7.0) highlighted large G × E × M interactions, confirming the potential of integrating crop modelling and GP to supporting breeding programs targeting adaptation to climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110560
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending genomic prediction to future climates through crop modelling. A case study on heading time in barley

Joanne Russell, Alessandro Tondelli, Ana M. Casas, Livia Paleari et al.
3 citations
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
5.25
article

Extending genomic prediction to future climates through crop modelling. A case study on heading time in barley

Joanne Russell, Alessandro Tondelli, Ana M. Casas, Livia Paleari, Alan H. Schulman, Laura Rossini, Ernesto Igartua, Luigi Cattivelli, Robbie Waugh, Roberto Confalonieri, Andrea Visoni
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• We integrated crop models and genomics to extend prediction to unknown environments. • Barley heading date recorded in a wide range of conditions was used as a case study . • Prediction accuracy was good for test genotypes in unknown environments. • Large G × E × M interactions were found when extending prediction to future climates. • This approach can support plant breeding targeting adaptation to climate change . Integrating genomic prediction (GP) and biophysical crop models has the potential to support plant breeding in defining adapting strategies to climate change. However, whether this integrated approach can actually broaden the prediction domain to unexplored environments is still unclear. We showed how crop models can extend GP to new environments and capture genotype-specific response to future climate conditions. Days to heading (HD) in spring barley was used as a case study, given the primary role of phenology for crop adaptation. Phenotypic and genomic (50 K Illumina SNP array) data for 151 two-row genotypes were used, with HD determined on 17 site × season combinations spread from the Mediterranean basin to Northern Europe. A dedicated modelling solution was developed by integrating approaches from the WARM and WOFOST crop models, with optimization algorithms used to derive accession-specific values of most relevant model parameters. GP was carried out on the model parameters with the R package rr-BLUP, and the resulting markers-derived parameters were used to simulate heading date with the crop model explicitly reproducing G × E × M interactions. Prediction accuracy for unknown genotypes was evaluated through ten-fold cross validation, whereas the capability of crop models to extend GP to unexplored environments was evaluated with a leave-one site-out cross validation. Results were encouraging, with average R 2 , RMSE and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency for unknown genotypes in unexplored environments equal to 0.97, 9.27, and 0.94, respectively. Accession-specific HD under future climates (20 seasons centred on 2060 generated for the IPSL-CM6A-LR realization of SSP3–7.0) highlighted large G × E × M interactions, confirming the potential of integrating crop modelling and GP to supporting breeding programs targeting adaptation to climate change.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 368
University of Helsinki (FI), James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Milan (IT), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), Institut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique (FR), National Research Council (LK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.