The Race of Desire

Through a close reading of an all-but-forgotten text by Gilles Deleuze, “Sex-Pol in Action,” this article studies the racialization of desire. In “Sex-Pol in Action,” Deleuze argues that the FHAR (Front homosexuel d'action révolutionnaire), a gay liberationist movement in early 1970s France, radically reconceptualized desire as the “nonhuman . . . point within each of us where . . . identity . . . is abolished.” Deleuze hopes to distinguish this queer potentiality of desire from the racially fetishistic, “Arabophilic” desires avowed by many of the white gay men in the FHAR. Reading Deleuze's text against itself, however, the author troubles this easy distinction so as to suggest that desire itself—desire as the “nonhuman within human sex”—is always already racialized. The article suggests that this is the common function served by the FHAR's Arab “beast” as well as Deleuze and Guattari's “savage” (in Capitalism and Schizophrenia): that is, to serve as a container for desire as humanity's constitutive lack/excess, its most sub/superhuman traits. By rereading “Sex-Pol in Action” through recent theorizations of the racial plasticity of sex, the author contends that this text illuminates the racial antagonisms that continue to haunt Deleuzean and other queer imaginaries of desire, becoming, and (non)humanism today.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-11636331
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Race of Desire

Míša Stekl
1 links
GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies
Race, History, and American Society
article

The Race of Desire

Míša Stekl
article en

Abstract

Through a close reading of an all-but-forgotten text by Gilles Deleuze, “Sex-Pol in Action,” this article studies the racialization of desire. In “Sex-Pol in Action,” Deleuze argues that the FHAR (Front homosexuel d'action révolutionnaire), a gay liberationist movement in early 1970s France, radically reconceptualized desire as the “nonhuman . . . point within each of us where . . . identity . . . is abolished.” Deleuze hopes to distinguish this queer potentiality of desire from the racially fetishistic, “Arabophilic” desires avowed by many of the white gay men in the FHAR. Reading Deleuze's text against itself, however, the author troubles this easy distinction so as to suggest that desire itself—desire as the “nonhuman within human sex”—is always already racialized. The article suggests that this is the common function served by the FHAR's Arab “beast” as well as Deleuze and Guattari's “savage” (in Capitalism and Schizophrenia): that is, to serve as a container for desire as humanity's constitutive lack/excess, its most sub/superhuman traits. By rereading “Sex-Pol in Action” through recent theorizations of the racial plasticity of sex, the author contends that this text illuminates the racial antagonisms that continue to haunt Deleuzean and other queer imaginaries of desire, becoming, and (non)humanism today.

GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay StudiesVol. 31(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.