Validation of the Flourishing Scale and the Positive and Negative Experience Scale: Focusing on Special Education Teachers

Purpose: The study validated the Flourishing Scale (FS) and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) for assessing psychosocial and emotional well-being. Method: Internal consistency, construct validity (factor structure, AVE, discriminant, and nomological validity), and criterion validity were evaluated among 225 special education teachers from the Gwangju and Jeonnam. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the FS as one-factor model and the SPANE as two-factor. Both the FS and SPANE met the AVE criterion (> .50). The square of the correlation coefficients between the factors of the FS and SPANE was smaller than the AVE values (discriminant). Each factor of the FS and SPANE showed significant correlations with grit, self-efficacy, and happiness (nomological). Each factor of the FS and SPANE showed significant positive correlations with life and job satisfaction (criterion). Conclusion: The FS and SPANE are suitable tools for assessing well-being among special education teachers.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23108/decrc.2024.6.4.1
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Flourishing Scale and the Positive and Negative Experience Scale: Focusing on Special Education Teachers

Myong‐In Lee, Hee-Choel Choi, Sanghee Park, Young Mi Kim
1 links
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Validation of the Flourishing Scale and the Positive and Negative Experience Scale: Focusing on Special Education Teachers

Myong‐In Lee, Hee-Choel Choi, Sanghee Park, Young Mi Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The study validated the Flourishing Scale (FS) and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) for assessing psychosocial and emotional well-being. Method: Internal consistency, construct validity (factor structure, AVE, discriminant, and nomological validity), and criterion validity were evaluated among 225 special education teachers from the Gwangju and Jeonnam. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the FS as one-factor model and the SPANE as two-factor. Both the FS and SPANE met the AVE criterion (> .50). The square of the correlation coefficients between the factors of the FS and SPANE was smaller than the AVE values (discriminant). Each factor of the FS and SPANE showed significant correlations with grit, self-efficacy, and happiness (nomological). Each factor of the FS and SPANE showed significant positive correlations with life and job satisfaction (criterion). Conclusion: The FS and SPANE are suitable tools for assessing well-being among special education teachers.

Vol. 6(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of the Flourishing Scale and the Positive and Negative Experience Scale: Focusing on Special Education Teachers — Myong‐In Lee, Hee-Choel Choi, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS