A clinical benchmark of public self-supervised pathology foundation models

The use of self-supervised learning to train pathology foundation models has increased substantially in the past few years. Notably, several models trained on large quantities of clinical data have been made publicly available in recent months. This will significantly enhance scientific research in computational pathology and help bridge the gap between research and clinical deployment. With the increase in availability of public foundation models of different sizes, trained using different algorithms on different datasets, it becomes important to establish a benchmark to compare the performance of such models on a variety of clinically relevant tasks spanning multiple organs and diseases. In this work, we present a collection of pathology datasets comprising clinical slides associated with clinically relevant endpoints including cancer diagnoses and a variety of biomarkers generated during standard hospital operation from three medical centers. We leverage these datasets to systematically assess the performance of public pathology foundation models and provide insights into best practices for training foundation models and selecting appropriate pretrained models. To enable the community to evaluate their models on our clinical datasets, we make available an automated benchmarking pipeline for external use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58796-1
Citations
51
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
126.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A clinical benchmark of public self-supervised pathology foundation models

Adam J. Schoenfeld, Aryeh Stock, Ricky Kwan, Ruchika Verma et al.
51 citations
Nature Communications
AI in cancer detection
126.53
article

A clinical benchmark of public self-supervised pathology foundation models

Adam J. Schoenfeld, Aryeh Stock, Ricky Kwan, Ruchika Verma, Kuan‐lin Huang, Abdülkadir Elmas, Brandon Veremis, Manbir Singh, Noora Neittaanmäki, Jane Houldsworth, Gabriele Campanella, Chad Vanderbilt, Shengjia Chen, Jennifer Zeng, Matt Croken, Ivan Shujski, Silke Muehlstedt
article en
51 citations

Abstract

The use of self-supervised learning to train pathology foundation models has increased substantially in the past few years. Notably, several models trained on large quantities of clinical data have been made publicly available in recent months. This will significantly enhance scientific research in computational pathology and help bridge the gap between research and clinical deployment. With the increase in availability of public foundation models of different sizes, trained using different algorithms on different datasets, it becomes important to establish a benchmark to compare the performance of such models on a variety of clinically relevant tasks spanning multiple organs and diseases. In this work, we present a collection of pathology datasets comprising clinical slides associated with clinically relevant endpoints including cancer diagnoses and a variety of biomarkers generated during standard hospital operation from three medical centers. We leverage these datasets to systematically assess the performance of public pathology foundation models and provide insights into best practices for training foundation models and selecting appropriate pretrained models. To enable the community to evaluate their models on our clinical datasets, we make available an automated benchmarking pipeline for external use.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Library of Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
AI in cancer detection
126.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.