Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Comfort in Caring for Pregnant People with Physical Disabilities

Pregnant people with disabilities face higher complication rates, yet few guidelines exist on caring for this population. This study evaluates obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents' comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities.A 19-question e-survey was developed and piloted for content and face validation. Likert scale was used to assess comfort in caring for pregnant patients with physical disabilities. The e-survey was sent to U.S. OBGYN residents via CREOG-coordinator listserv, a listserv to all U.S. OBGYN residency coordinators, in February 2024, with three reminder emails. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and variables with clinical and statistical significance were considered for adjustment in regression models.Eighty-eight residents completed the survey. The mean age was 29 years; 88% identified as female. All ACOG regions were represented. Eight and 44% reported formal education on disability care in residency and medical school, respectively. Seventy-three percent felt uncomfortable positioning disabled patients for a pelvic examination, 59% felt uncomfortable discussing sexual health practices, and 89% felt uncomfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery. Those without education in residency were 91% less likely to be comfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery (absolute risk reduction [aRR]: 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 and 0.59). Only 30% were comfortable discussing lactation/breastfeeding with patients with physical disabilities; residents without personal experience including caring for family members or friends or other caretaking experiences were 66% less likely to be comfortable (aRR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12 and 0.99). A total of 92.5% of residents wanted more education in this space. Of those 83, 71, and 82% desired didactics, patient panels, and simulations, respectively.Among responding residents, comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities is low. Additional training is necessary to adequately care for this population. · OBGYN resident comfort with disability care is low.. · Few residents receive formal disability training.. · Formal education improves disability care comfort..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2588-4900
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pregnancy-related medical research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Comfort in Caring for Pregnant People with Physical Disabilities

Claire Zabelle Kalpakjian, Sarah K. Dotters‐Katz, Susan J. Carlson, Audrey Aitelli
1 citations
American Journal of Perinatology
Pregnancy-related medical research
1.88
article

Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Comfort in Caring for Pregnant People with Physical Disabilities

Claire Zabelle Kalpakjian, Sarah K. Dotters‐Katz, Susan J. Carlson, Audrey Aitelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pregnant people with disabilities face higher complication rates, yet few guidelines exist on caring for this population. This study evaluates obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents' comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities.A 19-question e-survey was developed and piloted for content and face validation. Likert scale was used to assess comfort in caring for pregnant patients with physical disabilities. The e-survey was sent to U.S. OBGYN residents via CREOG-coordinator listserv, a listserv to all U.S. OBGYN residency coordinators, in February 2024, with three reminder emails. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and variables with clinical and statistical significance were considered for adjustment in regression models.Eighty-eight residents completed the survey. The mean age was 29 years; 88% identified as female. All ACOG regions were represented. Eight and 44% reported formal education on disability care in residency and medical school, respectively. Seventy-three percent felt uncomfortable positioning disabled patients for a pelvic examination, 59% felt uncomfortable discussing sexual health practices, and 89% felt uncomfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery. Those without education in residency were 91% less likely to be comfortable making recommendations regarding the mode of delivery (absolute risk reduction [aRR]: 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 and 0.59). Only 30% were comfortable discussing lactation/breastfeeding with patients with physical disabilities; residents without personal experience including caring for family members or friends or other caretaking experiences were 66% less likely to be comfortable (aRR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12 and 0.99). A total of 92.5% of residents wanted more education in this space. Of those 83, 71, and 82% desired didactics, patient panels, and simulations, respectively.Among responding residents, comfort in caring for pregnant people with physical disabilities is low. Additional training is necessary to adequately care for this population. · OBGYN resident comfort with disability care is low.. · Few residents receive formal disability training.. · Formal education improves disability care comfort..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 43(01)
Duke University (US), Michigan Medicine (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Duke University Health System (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Pregnancy-related medical research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.