Factors in and Perspectives of Achieving Co‐Production of Knowledge With Arctic Indigenous Peoples

Abstract Co‐production of knowledge (CPK) is a process of bringing together diverse perspectives from researchers, agency, and community partners to achieve a shared research goal. The main objective of this article is to provide tools for achieving CPK in research projects, especially with Alaska Native and Arctic Indigenous communities. Team members need to understand their positionality and be aware of assumptions and biases to come to jointly agreed upon project priorities. To assist researchers in reflecting on their positionality, we present research paradigm dispositions from commonly trained methodologies and academic norms. Differences across the dispositions are highlighted in decision‐making, success metrics, evaluation, and validation of outputs. Factors of Success were synthesized from existing literature on CPK, boundary spanning, the science of team science, convergence, Indigenous methodologies, and best practices to understand the CPK process. These Factors of Success are presented in a typical project life cycle logic model, categorized into inputs, process, and outcomes. Given the limited time and resources of research projects and activities, some factors will be given stronger emphasis over others. This article provides tools for transparent communication between researchers and community or agency partners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Science
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023csj000074
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors in and Perspectives of Achieving Co‐Production of Knowledge With Arctic Indigenous Peoples

Margaret Rudolf, Elizabeth Figus, John O’Connor, Sarah F. Trainor et al.
3 citations
Community Science
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
8.45
article

Factors in and Perspectives of Achieving Co‐Production of Knowledge With Arctic Indigenous Peoples

Margaret Rudolf, Elizabeth Figus, John O’Connor, Sarah F. Trainor, Richard Hum
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Co‐production of knowledge (CPK) is a process of bringing together diverse perspectives from researchers, agency, and community partners to achieve a shared research goal. The main objective of this article is to provide tools for achieving CPK in research projects, especially with Alaska Native and Arctic Indigenous communities. Team members need to understand their positionality and be aware of assumptions and biases to come to jointly agreed upon project priorities. To assist researchers in reflecting on their positionality, we present research paradigm dispositions from commonly trained methodologies and academic norms. Differences across the dispositions are highlighted in decision‐making, success metrics, evaluation, and validation of outputs. Factors of Success were synthesized from existing literature on CPK, boundary spanning, the science of team science, convergence, Indigenous methodologies, and best practices to understand the CPK process. These Factors of Success are presented in a typical project life cycle logic model, categorized into inputs, process, and outcomes. Given the limited time and resources of research projects and activities, some factors will be given stronger emphasis over others. This article provides tools for transparent communication between researchers and community or agency partners.

Community ScienceVol. 4(2)
University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), Raven (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Climate Program Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.