Understanding Nurses’ Perspectives on Work Stoppages: A Qualitative Case Study in Southern California

Nurse work stoppages are a significant concern within healthcare organizations, deeply affecting business operations, staff dynamics, and organizational stability. This qualitative case study investigated the complex factors contributing to these stoppages among unionized nurses in Southern California, aiming to uncover nuanced perceptions and identify effective resolution strategies. Using semi-structured interviews with 15 participants and a focus group session, this study gathered in-depth qualitative data to comprehensively understand the motivations behind these collective actions. Thematic analysis revealed several key findings. Factors driving work stoppages included a lack of administrative support, inadequate staffing levels, and limited autonomy in clinical decision-making. Emotional stress and frustration over poor leadership engagement and insufficient feedback mechanisms exacerbated nurses’ feelings of disempowerment and dissatisfaction. These key findings confirmed that psycho-social and job-related factors significantly influence the decision to participate in strikes. This study proposed several strategies for healthcare administrators to mitigate the impact of nurse work stoppages. These include improving communication and feedback channels, providing more robust administrative and emotional support, and addressing the chronic staffing shortages contributing to nurse burnout. Additionally, fostering greater autonomy and decision-making power for nurses can enhance job satisfaction and reduce the frequency of strikes. Healthcare organizations can create a more harmonious and stable working environment by implementing these

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63289/a11502
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Nurses’ Perspectives on Work Stoppages: A Qualitative Case Study in Southern California

Mary Lind, T.J. Grant
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Understanding Nurses’ Perspectives on Work Stoppages: A Qualitative Case Study in Southern California

Mary Lind, T.J. Grant
article en

Abstract

Nurse work stoppages are a significant concern within healthcare organizations, deeply affecting business operations, staff dynamics, and organizational stability. This qualitative case study investigated the complex factors contributing to these stoppages among unionized nurses in Southern California, aiming to uncover nuanced perceptions and identify effective resolution strategies. Using semi-structured interviews with 15 participants and a focus group session, this study gathered in-depth qualitative data to comprehensively understand the motivations behind these collective actions. Thematic analysis revealed several key findings. Factors driving work stoppages included a lack of administrative support, inadequate staffing levels, and limited autonomy in clinical decision-making. Emotional stress and frustration over poor leadership engagement and insufficient feedback mechanisms exacerbated nurses’ feelings of disempowerment and dissatisfaction. These key findings confirmed that psycho-social and job-related factors significantly influence the decision to participate in strikes. This study proposed several strategies for healthcare administrators to mitigate the impact of nurse work stoppages. These include improving communication and feedback channels, providing more robust administrative and emotional support, and addressing the chronic staffing shortages contributing to nurse burnout. Additionally, fostering greater autonomy and decision-making power for nurses can enhance job satisfaction and reduce the frequency of strikes. Healthcare organizations can create a more harmonious and stable working environment by implementing these

Vol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.