How is Nitrogen Use Efficiency Impacted by Varying Contributions from Fertilizer, Manure, and Biological Fixation in U.S. and Global Croplands?

Highlights NUE response to N addition is dependent on N source (fertilizer, manure, and biological fixation). Random forest models captured 71% and 47% NUE variance for CONUS and global croplands. Contribution from biological N fixation was most important for explaining NUE variance, followed by manure and fertilizer contributions. ABSTRACT. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is a useful indicator of the tradeoffs among cropland harvest nitrogen (N) and total N fertilization. Total N fertilization can be fulfilled by different sources depending on local availability, livestock production, land use and crop distribution, and economics, all of which change drastically in space and time. While NUE assesses crop harvest N response to total N fertilization, it typically does not distinguish between N fertilization sources, and thus little is known on how varying contributions from diverse N inputs impact NUE achieved in a region and year. Here, we use long-term (1961–2020) N budgets combined with random forest modeling to address this knowledge gap for global croplands, with a finer spatial emphasis on conterminous United States (CONUS) croplands. Random forest models using fractional fertilization contributions (F fert , F manure , and F bnf for synthetic fertilizers, livestock manure, and biological N fixation, respectively) and captured 71% and 47% of space-time variance in NUE for CONUS and global croplands, respectively. F bnf was the most important predictor for explaining variance in county/country-year NUE, followed by F manure , and F fert . Contributions from each of the input sources exerted distinct controls on NUE through its observed ranges and these controls were visualized using partial dependence plots for NUE. The models establish that regions and years where a higher proportion of total N fertilization is met by biological N fixation (relative to fertilizers and manure) have higher NUE. Overall, our findings improve understanding of how NUE may be optimized by managing diverse N sources with the aim of meeting economic and sustainability goals. Keywords: Chemical fertilizers, Livestock, Nitrogen cycle, Nutrient budgets, Nutrients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the ASABE
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.16114
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How is Nitrogen Use Efficiency Impacted by Varying Contributions from Fertilizer, Manure, and Biological Fixation in U.S. and Global Croplands?

J. K. Ladha, Raj Cibin, K. J. Van Meter, Linda R. Schott et al.
Journal of the ASABE
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
article

How is Nitrogen Use Efficiency Impacted by Varying Contributions from Fertilizer, Manure, and Biological Fixation in U.S. and Global Croplands?

J. K. Ladha, Raj Cibin, K. J. Van Meter, Linda R. Schott, Suat Irmak, Meetpal S. Kukal, Varshini Kumanan
article en

Abstract

Highlights NUE response to N addition is dependent on N source (fertilizer, manure, and biological fixation). Random forest models captured 71% and 47% NUE variance for CONUS and global croplands. Contribution from biological N fixation was most important for explaining NUE variance, followed by manure and fertilizer contributions. ABSTRACT. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is a useful indicator of the tradeoffs among cropland harvest nitrogen (N) and total N fertilization. Total N fertilization can be fulfilled by different sources depending on local availability, livestock production, land use and crop distribution, and economics, all of which change drastically in space and time. While NUE assesses crop harvest N response to total N fertilization, it typically does not distinguish between N fertilization sources, and thus little is known on how varying contributions from diverse N inputs impact NUE achieved in a region and year. Here, we use long-term (1961–2020) N budgets combined with random forest modeling to address this knowledge gap for global croplands, with a finer spatial emphasis on conterminous United States (CONUS) croplands. Random forest models using fractional fertilization contributions (F fert , F manure , and F bnf for synthetic fertilizers, livestock manure, and biological N fixation, respectively) and captured 71% and 47% of space-time variance in NUE for CONUS and global croplands, respectively. F bnf was the most important predictor for explaining variance in county/country-year NUE, followed by F manure , and F fert . Contributions from each of the input sources exerted distinct controls on NUE through its observed ranges and these controls were visualized using partial dependence plots for NUE. The models establish that regions and years where a higher proportion of total N fertilization is met by biological N fixation (relative to fertilizers and manure) have higher NUE. Overall, our findings improve understanding of how NUE may be optimized by managing diverse N sources with the aim of meeting economic and sustainability goals. Keywords: Chemical fertilizers, Livestock, Nitrogen cycle, Nutrient budgets, Nutrients.

Journal of the ASABEVol. 68(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.