Evaluation of the Efficiency of Detection of Bacterial DNA in Milk and Tissue Samples from Cattle, Sheep, and Goats by Conventional and Nested PCR Targeting <i>COM1</i> , <i>SOD</i> and Transposase IS <i>1111</i> Genes of <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> Gen

Abstract Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis, caused by Coxiella burnetii , an obligate intracellular bacterium that affects both humans and animals. The serious consequences on human health and the economic losses it causes, require the use of rapid, accurate, and sensitive diagnostic methods for its detection. PCR is the most widely used method for the molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii . Considering available information on the different sensitivity of PCR assays according to the selected genetic targets to be amplified, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of conventional and nested PCRs performed with primers Trans 1/2 , OMP 1-4 , and CB1/CB2 for the detection of Coxiella burnetii genome in samples, obtained from cattle, sheep and goats. Thirty archival DNAs, extracted from placentae, vaginal swabs, bulk tank milk samples, and cheese were tested. The highest level of detection was found when samples were tested with nested PCR with primers OMP 1-4 , targeting the Com1 gene (96.3%), and to a lesser extent with conventional PCR (56.7% positivity), performed with primers Trans 1/2 , encompassing a part of the IS 1111 insertion sequence. A correlation was found between the detection efficiency of some primers and the type and origin of the samples. The results show that the sensitivity of the various PCR protocols for the detection of Coxiella burnetii could vary, thus the results obtained with one genetic marker should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Macedonian Veterinary Review
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2025-0020
Primary Topic
Vector-borne infectious diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Detection of Bacterial DNA in Milk and Tissue Samples from Cattle, Sheep, and Goats by Conventional and Nested PCR Targeting COM1 , SOD and Transposase IS 1111 Genes of Coxiella burnetii Gen

Konstantin Simeonov, Petia Genova-Kalоu, Keytlin Todorova
Macedonian Veterinary Review
Vector-borne infectious diseases
article

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Detection of Bacterial DNA in Milk and Tissue Samples from Cattle, Sheep, and Goats by Conventional and Nested PCR Targeting COM1 , SOD and Transposase IS 1111 Genes of Coxiella burnetii Gen

Konstantin Simeonov, Petia Genova-Kalоu, Keytlin Todorova
article en

Abstract

Abstract Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis, caused by Coxiella burnetii , an obligate intracellular bacterium that affects both humans and animals. The serious consequences on human health and the economic losses it causes, require the use of rapid, accurate, and sensitive diagnostic methods for its detection. PCR is the most widely used method for the molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii . Considering available information on the different sensitivity of PCR assays according to the selected genetic targets to be amplified, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of conventional and nested PCRs performed with primers Trans 1/2 , OMP 1-4 , and CB1/CB2 for the detection of Coxiella burnetii genome in samples, obtained from cattle, sheep and goats. Thirty archival DNAs, extracted from placentae, vaginal swabs, bulk tank milk samples, and cheese were tested. The highest level of detection was found when samples were tested with nested PCR with primers OMP 1-4 , targeting the Com1 gene (96.3%), and to a lesser extent with conventional PCR (56.7% positivity), performed with primers Trans 1/2 , encompassing a part of the IS 1111 insertion sequence. A correlation was found between the detection efficiency of some primers and the type and origin of the samples. The results show that the sensitivity of the various PCR protocols for the detection of Coxiella burnetii could vary, thus the results obtained with one genetic marker should be interpreted with caution.

Macedonian Veterinary ReviewVol. 48(2)
National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (BG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Vector-borne infectious diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Detection of Bacterial DNA in Milk and Tissue Samples from Cattle, Sheep, and Goats by Conventional and Nested PCR Targeting <i>COM1</i> , <i>SOD</i> and Transposase IS <i>1111</i> Genes of <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> Gen — Konstantin Simeonov, Petia Genova-Kalоu, et al. · Macedonian Veterinary Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS