Quantifying future climate impacts on maize productivity under different irrigation management strategies: A high-resolution spatial analysis in the U.S. Great Plains

Producers east of the 100th meridian, a historically wetter portion of the Great Plains, face uncertainties regarding yield, irrigation water use, water productivity, and net returns due to the impacts of climate change in the region. These climate change impacts are spatially variable with a heterogeneous response to environmental variability and different water management techniques. Therefore, the present study addresses climate change impacts on irrigated maize productivity in the Eastern Kansas River Basin of the Great Plains at a fine spatial scale using Shawnee County, Kansas as a case study. We incorporated spatially variable soils and grid-level historical and future climate scenarios under different irrigation management strategies as inputs to CERES-Maize crop model. Our model validations closely matched observed yield and irrigation water use, with index of agreement values exceeding 0.85. Future climate projections (RCPs 4.5 and 8.5) were analyzed across three 25-year periods (2025–2049, 2050–2074, and 2075–2099) relative to historical conditions (1991–2015). Results showed yield declines of 21–38 % and 22–70 % (RCPs 4.5 and 8.5, respectively) due to shortened growing season length. Irrigation water use under full allocation increased by 9–23 %, while net returns declined significantly, resulting in significant decline in water productivity. We found that deficit irrigation strategies saved 3–15 % of water without further diminishing maize productivity. These findings highlight the importance of fine scale climate impact analysis of crop productivity. Future maize production in the region necessitates integrating yield-advancing cultivars with improved water management found in this study in order to meet the expected grain demand over the next decades.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109490
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying future climate impacts on maize productivity under different irrigation management strategies: A high-resolution spatial analysis in the U.S. Great Plains

Stephen Welch, Samuel C. Zipper, Ikenna Onyekwelu, Vaishali Sharda
5 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Climate change impacts on agriculture
15.13
article

Quantifying future climate impacts on maize productivity under different irrigation management strategies: A high-resolution spatial analysis in the U.S. Great Plains

Stephen Welch, Samuel C. Zipper, Ikenna Onyekwelu, Vaishali Sharda
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Producers east of the 100th meridian, a historically wetter portion of the Great Plains, face uncertainties regarding yield, irrigation water use, water productivity, and net returns due to the impacts of climate change in the region. These climate change impacts are spatially variable with a heterogeneous response to environmental variability and different water management techniques. Therefore, the present study addresses climate change impacts on irrigated maize productivity in the Eastern Kansas River Basin of the Great Plains at a fine spatial scale using Shawnee County, Kansas as a case study. We incorporated spatially variable soils and grid-level historical and future climate scenarios under different irrigation management strategies as inputs to CERES-Maize crop model. Our model validations closely matched observed yield and irrigation water use, with index of agreement values exceeding 0.85. Future climate projections (RCPs 4.5 and 8.5) were analyzed across three 25-year periods (2025–2049, 2050–2074, and 2075–2099) relative to historical conditions (1991–2015). Results showed yield declines of 21–38 % and 22–70 % (RCPs 4.5 and 8.5, respectively) due to shortened growing season length. Irrigation water use under full allocation increased by 9–23 %, while net returns declined significantly, resulting in significant decline in water productivity. We found that deficit irrigation strategies saved 3–15 % of water without further diminishing maize productivity. These findings highlight the importance of fine scale climate impact analysis of crop productivity. Future maize production in the region necessitates integrating yield-advancing cultivars with improved water management found in this study in order to meet the expected grain demand over the next decades.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 313
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
15.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying future climate impacts on maize productivity under different irrigation management strategies: A high-resolution spatial analysis in the U.S. Great Plains — Stephen Welch, Samuel C. Zipper, et al. · Agricultural Water Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS