The value of regrowth forests and woodlands for threatened fauna species

Whilst the loss of remnant ecosystems is a key driver of the biodiversity crisis, the loss of regrowth ecosystems is sometimes overlooked. The impact of regrowth vegetation loss on threatened fauna is not well understood, particularly relative to remnant vegetation loss. Here, we used structured expert elicitation to determine the minimum age at which regrowth vegetation is used by 33 threatened fauna species, and how quickly the habitat value of regrowth vegetation converges on that of remnant vegetation. Then, using remotely sensed data, we estimated the proportion of each species' current habitat that comprises regrowth vegetation. We conducted our analysis in Queensland, Australia, a jurisdiction with approximately 7.6 million hectares of regrowth woody vegetation (as of 2021) that can be cleared under exemption in state vegetation management laws. We found that the median minimum age of regrowth vegetation use for 33 focal species was 15 years (ranging from 3 to 68 years), while the median age at which regrowth vegetation provided 75 % of the relative value of remnant habitat was 36 years (ranging from 11 to 193 years). The variation in value of younger regrowth among species was driven by species-specific factors such as dependence on tree hollows, diet and breeding requirements. A median of 18 % of current potential habitat for the 33 focal species comprised regrowth vegetation. Most potential habitat for these species that had been cleared since 2018 was regrowth vegetation (71 %). We conclude that regrowth vegetation provides valuable threatened species habitat in Queensland from relatively young ages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111131
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The value of regrowth forests and woodlands for threatened fauna species

Jeremy S. Simmonds, Michelle Ward, Hannah Thomas, Martine Maron et al.
3 citations
Biological Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
5.15
article

The value of regrowth forests and woodlands for threatened fauna species

Jeremy S. Simmonds, Michelle Ward, Hannah Thomas, Martine Maron, Teresa J. Eyre
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Whilst the loss of remnant ecosystems is a key driver of the biodiversity crisis, the loss of regrowth ecosystems is sometimes overlooked. The impact of regrowth vegetation loss on threatened fauna is not well understood, particularly relative to remnant vegetation loss. Here, we used structured expert elicitation to determine the minimum age at which regrowth vegetation is used by 33 threatened fauna species, and how quickly the habitat value of regrowth vegetation converges on that of remnant vegetation. Then, using remotely sensed data, we estimated the proportion of each species' current habitat that comprises regrowth vegetation. We conducted our analysis in Queensland, Australia, a jurisdiction with approximately 7.6 million hectares of regrowth woody vegetation (as of 2021) that can be cleared under exemption in state vegetation management laws. We found that the median minimum age of regrowth vegetation use for 33 focal species was 15 years (ranging from 3 to 68 years), while the median age at which regrowth vegetation provided 75 % of the relative value of remnant habitat was 36 years (ranging from 11 to 193 years). The variation in value of younger regrowth among species was driven by species-specific factors such as dependence on tree hollows, diet and breeding requirements. A median of 18 % of current potential habitat for the 33 focal species comprised regrowth vegetation. Most potential habitat for these species that had been cleared since 2018 was regrowth vegetation (71 %). We conclude that regrowth vegetation provides valuable threatened species habitat in Queensland from relatively young ages.

Biological ConservationVol. 307
Griffith University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Queensland Government (AU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.