Willingness to pay for post-mining landscape restoration

This paper examines the long-run impacts of mining-induced displacement and resettlement and uses the contingent valuation method to estimate displaced and resettled Mozambican households’ willingness to pay (measured in labour) to restore the landscape where they used to live before mining began there. Previous studies found that resettlement worsened the welfare of the communities affected, but these studies have generally been conducted shortly after the resettlements concerned had taken place while this study looks at longer-run impacts. The study results indicate that, on average, households were willing to contribute about nine working days per month. The results further indicate that resettled respondents had been adaptive and had used the monetary compensation they were given for resettlement to buy productive land to offset that lost due to resettlement. However, they still saw themselves as worse off than before their relocation. One explanation for this is that they are now far from marketplaces and the river, making it difficult to develop new sources of income and have access to water. Mitigation interventions and future resettlements should therefore think more carefully about selecting resettlement sites.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101157
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Willingness to pay for post-mining landscape restoration

José Jeremias Ganhane
1 citations
Environmental Challenges
Economic and Environmental Valuation
3.13
article

Willingness to pay for post-mining landscape restoration

José Jeremias Ganhane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the long-run impacts of mining-induced displacement and resettlement and uses the contingent valuation method to estimate displaced and resettled Mozambican households’ willingness to pay (measured in labour) to restore the landscape where they used to live before mining began there. Previous studies found that resettlement worsened the welfare of the communities affected, but these studies have generally been conducted shortly after the resettlements concerned had taken place while this study looks at longer-run impacts. The study results indicate that, on average, households were willing to contribute about nine working days per month. The results further indicate that resettled respondents had been adaptive and had used the monetary compensation they were given for resettlement to buy productive land to offset that lost due to resettlement. However, they still saw themselves as worse off than before their relocation. One explanation for this is that they are now far from marketplaces and the river, making it difficult to develop new sources of income and have access to water. Mitigation interventions and future resettlements should therefore think more carefully about selecting resettlement sites.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 19
Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Willingness to pay for post-mining landscape restoration — José Jeremias Ganhane · Environmental Challenges (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS