Disruption mitigation modeling for the SPARC tokamak

Two primary systems planned for disruption mitigation in the SPARC tokamak, massive gas injection (MGI), and the runaway electron mitigation coil (REMC), are modeled with the 3D MHD code NIMROD. MGI is modeled in four configurations, and each of the 6-valve and 4-valve configurations considered is predicted to produce a high radiation fraction (>95%) and low toroidal peaking factor [<1.5 during the thermal quench (TQ)]. The MGI-induced TQ is also modeled in conjunction with the REMC in two different scenarios: one in which the REMC is assumed to be a closed-circuit, and another in which it can carry current only during the CQ. The closed-circuit coil has some effect on the timing of the TQ onset but not on the overall TQ dynamics or subsequent REMC effectiveness. The REMC is able to maintain stochastic fields in the plasma so long as the safety factor at the magnetic axis remains below 2 (q0<2), but the safety factor evolution, in turn, depends on a number of factors, including the treatment of the region outside of the SPARC limiter surrounding the plasma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0254080
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disruption mitigation modeling for the SPARC tokamak

A. Battey, C. Hansen, R. A. Tinguely, V.A. Izzo et al.
5 citations
Physics of Plasmas
Magnetic confinement fusion research
9.35
article

Disruption mitigation modeling for the SPARC tokamak

A. Battey, C. Hansen, R. A. Tinguely, V.A. Izzo, B. Stein-Lubrano, R. Sweeney
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Two primary systems planned for disruption mitigation in the SPARC tokamak, massive gas injection (MGI), and the runaway electron mitigation coil (REMC), are modeled with the 3D MHD code NIMROD. MGI is modeled in four configurations, and each of the 6-valve and 4-valve configurations considered is predicted to produce a high radiation fraction (>95%) and low toroidal peaking factor [<1.5 during the thermal quench (TQ)]. The MGI-induced TQ is also modeled in conjunction with the REMC in two different scenarios: one in which the REMC is assumed to be a closed-circuit, and another in which it can carry current only during the CQ. The closed-circuit coil has some effect on the timing of the TQ onset but not on the overall TQ dynamics or subsequent REMC effectiveness. The REMC is able to maintain stochastic fields in the plasma so long as the safety factor at the magnetic axis remains below 2 (q0<2), but the safety factor evolution, in turn, depends on a number of factors, including the treatment of the region outside of the SPARC limiter surrounding the plasma.

Physics of PlasmasVol. 32(4)
Plasma Technology (United States) (US), Fusion Academy (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
9.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disruption mitigation modeling for the SPARC tokamak — A. Battey, C. Hansen, et al. · Physics of Plasmas (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS