Reappraisal of the Continental Rifting and Seafloor Spreading That Formed the South China Sea

Recently published marine geophysical and seafloor drilling data permit a substantive reappraisal of the rifting and spreading that formed the South China Sea (SCS). The SCS rifted margins are different from those of the Atlantic type, having higher strain rates, younger orogenic crust, and distributed syn-rift magmatism. Rifting ~66–11 Ma and spreading 30–14 Ma split a Cretaceous Andean arc and forearc, producing >700 km of seafloor spreading in the east and a ~2000-km-wide rifted margin in the west. Luconia Shoals–Dangerous Grounds–Reed Bank–north Palawan–SW Mindoro were separated from China when the SCS opened. Brittle faulting of the upper crust was decoupled from ductile flow and magmatic intrusion of the lower crust, producing wide rifting with thin spots held together by less extended surrounds. Sediments accumulated in inter-montane lakes. Transform faults formed at/after breakup to link offset spreading segments. Spreading in the eastern subbasin from C11n to C5AD was at rates averaging 62 mm/yr, 30–24 Ma, decreasing to 38.5 mm/yr younger than 23 Ma. Spreading reorganization was common as margin segments broke up to the SW and spreading directions changed from ~N-S before 23 Ma to NW-SE after 17 Ma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15040152
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Geological and Geophysical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reappraisal of the Continental Rifting and Seafloor Spreading That Formed the South China Sea

Brian Taylor
10 citations
Geosciences
Geological and Geophysical Studies
23.47
article

Reappraisal of the Continental Rifting and Seafloor Spreading That Formed the South China Sea

Brian Taylor
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Recently published marine geophysical and seafloor drilling data permit a substantive reappraisal of the rifting and spreading that formed the South China Sea (SCS). The SCS rifted margins are different from those of the Atlantic type, having higher strain rates, younger orogenic crust, and distributed syn-rift magmatism. Rifting ~66–11 Ma and spreading 30–14 Ma split a Cretaceous Andean arc and forearc, producing >700 km of seafloor spreading in the east and a ~2000-km-wide rifted margin in the west. Luconia Shoals–Dangerous Grounds–Reed Bank–north Palawan–SW Mindoro were separated from China when the SCS opened. Brittle faulting of the upper crust was decoupled from ductile flow and magmatic intrusion of the lower crust, producing wide rifting with thin spots held together by less extended surrounds. Sediments accumulated in inter-montane lakes. Transform faults formed at/after breakup to link offset spreading segments. Spreading in the eastern subbasin from C11n to C5AD was at rates averaging 62 mm/yr, 30–24 Ma, decreasing to 38.5 mm/yr younger than 23 Ma. Spreading reorganization was common as margin segments broke up to the SW and spreading directions changed from ~N-S before 23 Ma to NW-SE after 17 Ma.

GeosciencesVol. 15(4)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Geological and Geophysical Studies
23.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reappraisal of the Continental Rifting and Seafloor Spreading That Formed the South China Sea — Brian Taylor · Geosciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS