Verification of the thesis on the increase in depressive and alarming trends in the 2010-2020s (using the example of a cohort and longitudinal study)

<p><strong>Context and relevance.</strong> A comparative analysis of the severity of anxiety, distress and depression in four cohort groups of students in 2013, 2018, 2020 and 2022 is aimed at empirically verifying the thesis of a steady increase in these adverse conditions in the population. <strong>Methods and materials.</strong> The total sample size was 557 students of humanitarian and technical specialties. The sample was formed taking into account the possibility of influencing the results of events that occurred in 2020 and 2022 in order to exclude the influence of objectively stressogenic factors on the study results. The study was conducted using the DASS — 21 psychodiagnostic technique, which allows comparisons with other countries. <strong>Results. </strong>Together with the cohort study, a longitudinal study was conducted, as a result of which the initial conclusions were verified that there was insufficient empirical evidence of a sharp increase in unfavorable emotional states among students during the period of self-isolation and during the rapid transition to distance learning. The most clearly unfavorable emotional states were expressed in students in 2018, that is, in a period not marked by extraordinary events that violate the usual way of social functioning. A longitudinal study found that in 2020, during the period of restrictive measures in connection with the prevention of the spread of coronavirus infection, the number of students with clinically significant manifestations of depression and anxiety was lower than in 2018. <strong>Conclusions. </strong>As a result of the study, initial conclusions regarding the lack of empirical support for a significant increase in adverse emotional states among students during self-isolation and the rapid transition to distance learning have been confirmed. However, no continuous increase in adverse emotional states related to extraordinary events occurring in 2020-2022 has been identified.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Psychology (Russia)
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2025180108
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of the thesis on the increase in depressive and alarming trends in the 2010-2020s (using the example of a cohort and longitudinal study)

T.A. Boldyreva, O.A. Scherbinina
1 citations
Experimental Psychology (Russia)
Health disparities and outcomes
2.17
article

Verification of the thesis on the increase in depressive and alarming trends in the 2010-2020s (using the example of a cohort and longitudinal study)

T.A. Boldyreva, O.A. Scherbinina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<p><strong>Context and relevance.</strong> A comparative analysis of the severity of anxiety, distress and depression in four cohort groups of students in 2013, 2018, 2020 and 2022 is aimed at empirically verifying the thesis of a steady increase in these adverse conditions in the population. <strong>Methods and materials.</strong> The total sample size was 557 students of humanitarian and technical specialties. The sample was formed taking into account the possibility of influencing the results of events that occurred in 2020 and 2022 in order to exclude the influence of objectively stressogenic factors on the study results. The study was conducted using the DASS — 21 psychodiagnostic technique, which allows comparisons with other countries. <strong>Results. </strong>Together with the cohort study, a longitudinal study was conducted, as a result of which the initial conclusions were verified that there was insufficient empirical evidence of a sharp increase in unfavorable emotional states among students during the period of self-isolation and during the rapid transition to distance learning. The most clearly unfavorable emotional states were expressed in students in 2018, that is, in a period not marked by extraordinary events that violate the usual way of social functioning. A longitudinal study found that in 2020, during the period of restrictive measures in connection with the prevention of the spread of coronavirus infection, the number of students with clinically significant manifestations of depression and anxiety was lower than in 2018. <strong>Conclusions. </strong>As a result of the study, initial conclusions regarding the lack of empirical support for a significant increase in adverse emotional states among students during self-isolation and the rapid transition to distance learning have been confirmed. However, no continuous increase in adverse emotional states related to extraordinary events occurring in 2020-2022 has been identified.</p>

Experimental Psychology (Russia)Vol. 18(1)
Orenburg State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Health disparities and outcomes
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.