The Science of Art Theft: Using Data to Identify Criminal Patterns, 1990–2022

Abstract Art theft is still a crime surrounded by inaccuracies. From the perception of flashy fictional thieves to unintentionally misleading monetary claims, the general public and some art and security professionals have a distorted vision of the scope of the criminal enterprise. As there is an alarming lack of empirical studies into the matter, this study aims to remedy the issue through the elaboration of a database to find common characteristics and aspects of interest amongst multiple art heists from the last three decades to provide a better understanding of crucial theft traits such as defeated security measures, methods of deception, timing and target selection, use of weapons and insider participation impact. Results indicate thieves tend to use brute force to defeat security measures; diversions and deceptions are a standard, uniform trends are present in absolute timing matters, and neither the use of weapons nor insiders appears to be the norm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cultural Property
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0940739125000098
Primary Topic
Archaeological Research and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Science of Art Theft: Using Data to Identify Criminal Patterns, 1990–2022

Marc Balcells, Sandra Clopés
International Journal of Cultural Property
Archaeological Research and Protection
article

The Science of Art Theft: Using Data to Identify Criminal Patterns, 1990–2022

Marc Balcells, Sandra Clopés
article en

Abstract

Abstract Art theft is still a crime surrounded by inaccuracies. From the perception of flashy fictional thieves to unintentionally misleading monetary claims, the general public and some art and security professionals have a distorted vision of the scope of the criminal enterprise. As there is an alarming lack of empirical studies into the matter, this study aims to remedy the issue through the elaboration of a database to find common characteristics and aspects of interest amongst multiple art heists from the last three decades to provide a better understanding of crucial theft traits such as defeated security measures, methods of deception, timing and target selection, use of weapons and insider participation impact. Results indicate thieves tend to use brute force to defeat security measures; diversions and deceptions are a standard, uniform trends are present in absolute timing matters, and neither the use of weapons nor insiders appears to be the norm.

International Journal of Cultural PropertyVol. 32(2)
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Archaeological Research and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Science of Art Theft: Using Data to Identify Criminal Patterns, 1990–2022 — Marc Balcells, Sandra Clopés · International Journal of Cultural Property (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS