Evaluating concurrency and gaps between self-report and vaccine card data for COVID-19 vaccination

We compared self-reported vaccination to vaccine card data to assess concurrency in a sample of Black young adults in Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina. We described vaccine card versus self-reported data over time and examined discrepancies in reporting between these two sources. Results indicated strong currency suggesting collection of self-reported data may be an acceptable proxy to requiring official vaccine documentation. However, since 58 % of participants did not upload a vaccine card, finding should be applied with caution. Minor differences were found and were generally due to boosters that were self-reported but were not on cards. The discrepancy in number of vaccines and boosters was likely because COVID-19 vaccination has become routine and vaccine cards are not being updated regularly. At this stage in the pandemic and for other vaccinations that become routine and are administered at pharmacies, self-report may be a reliable indication of the number of vaccinations received.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127136
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating concurrency and gaps between self-report and vaccine card data for COVID-19 vaccination

Marie C. D. Stoner, Erica N. Browne, Christyenne L Bond, Lisa Hightow‐Weidman et al.
1 citations
Vaccine
Influenza Virus Research Studies
1.35
article

Evaluating concurrency and gaps between self-report and vaccine card data for COVID-19 vaccination

Marie C. D. Stoner, Erica N. Browne, Christyenne L Bond, Lisa Hightow‐Weidman, Allysha C. Maragh‐Bass, Margo Adams Larsen, İbrahim Yiğit, Zachary Soberano, Audrey E. Pettifor, Henna Budhwani, PhD, MPH, Jacob B Stocks, Kathryn Elizabeth Muessig, Maria Leonora G. Comello, Noah Mancuso, Jenna Michaels
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We compared self-reported vaccination to vaccine card data to assess concurrency in a sample of Black young adults in Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina. We described vaccine card versus self-reported data over time and examined discrepancies in reporting between these two sources. Results indicated strong currency suggesting collection of self-reported data may be an acceptable proxy to requiring official vaccine documentation. However, since 58 % of participants did not upload a vaccine card, finding should be applied with caution. Minor differences were found and were generally due to boosters that were self-reported but were not on cards. The discrepancy in number of vaccines and boosters was likely because COVID-19 vaccination has become routine and vaccine cards are not being updated regularly. At this stage in the pandemic and for other vaccinations that become routine and are administered at pharmacies, self-report may be a reliable indication of the number of vaccinations received.

VaccineVol. 54
Florida State University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Family Health International 360 (US), RTI International (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Virtually Better (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.