Effect of a portion-size default nudge on meat consumption and diner satisfaction: controlled experiments in Stanford University dining halls

Reducing meat consumption, especially in high-intake countries such as the United States, is crucial in mitigating the climate and biodiversity crises and improving public health and animal welfare. Choice-architecture interventions or nudges in the food domain, such as choice defaults (e.g., reduced default portion sizes), can be powerful levers of behavior change. However, evidence remains limited in large-scale, real-life settings, and little is known about potential effects on diner satisfaction and backfiring effects that reduce or even reverse the desired behavior. These uncertainties have posed substantial barriers to scalability and wider adoption by the food service industry. In our single-blinded, quasi-experimental, pre-registered field interventions in Stanford University dining halls with staff-served portions, a 25% reduction in the serving spoon size (Study 1, 24 days, 364 diners, made-to-order burritos) produced a non-significant trend of 18% less meat served per day without reducing overall diner satisfaction (p = 0.059, d = 0.64) but with a wide CI that included the null (- 49.2, 1.07). A more substantial 50% reduction in serving spoon size (Study 2, 29 days, 1802 diners, varying menu items) did not reduce the amount of meat served (p = 0.60, d = 0.20), triggered backfiring effects, and significantly decreased diner satisfaction. Combining the two studies, the intervention did not significantly reduce meat consumption. While the trends in our findings are consistent with the 'norm range model'-i.e., that moderate portion reductions may decrease intake but drastic reductions may prompt compensatory eating-key differences and contextual nuances between the two studies help explain the mixed results. Future studies on the 'norm range' of default portion size nudges to reduce meat consumption across different menu items and food service models is suggested to increase our understanding of effective and scalable interventions that facilitate collective shifts towards more sustainable dietary behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22495-9
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of a portion-size default nudge on meat consumption and diner satisfaction: controlled experiments in Stanford University dining halls

Mika Braginsky, Jaclyn Bertoldo, Maya B. Mathur, Angela Y Zhang et al.
5 citations
BMC Public Health
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
8.58
article

Effect of a portion-size default nudge on meat consumption and diner satisfaction: controlled experiments in Stanford University dining halls

Mika Braginsky, Jaclyn Bertoldo, Maya B. Mathur, Angela Y Zhang, Anaïs Voşki, Lee Alan Levig, Michelle Mueller Ihrig, Suzanne Egan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Reducing meat consumption, especially in high-intake countries such as the United States, is crucial in mitigating the climate and biodiversity crises and improving public health and animal welfare. Choice-architecture interventions or nudges in the food domain, such as choice defaults (e.g., reduced default portion sizes), can be powerful levers of behavior change. However, evidence remains limited in large-scale, real-life settings, and little is known about potential effects on diner satisfaction and backfiring effects that reduce or even reverse the desired behavior. These uncertainties have posed substantial barriers to scalability and wider adoption by the food service industry. In our single-blinded, quasi-experimental, pre-registered field interventions in Stanford University dining halls with staff-served portions, a 25% reduction in the serving spoon size (Study 1, 24 days, 364 diners, made-to-order burritos) produced a non-significant trend of 18% less meat served per day without reducing overall diner satisfaction (p = 0.059, d = 0.64) but with a wide CI that included the null (- 49.2, 1.07). A more substantial 50% reduction in serving spoon size (Study 2, 29 days, 1802 diners, varying menu items) did not reduce the amount of meat served (p = 0.60, d = 0.20), triggered backfiring effects, and significantly decreased diner satisfaction. Combining the two studies, the intervention did not significantly reduce meat consumption. While the trends in our findings are consistent with the 'norm range model'-i.e., that moderate portion reductions may decrease intake but drastic reductions may prompt compensatory eating-key differences and contextual nuances between the two studies help explain the mixed results. Future studies on the 'norm range' of default portion size nudges to reduce meat consumption across different menu items and food service models is suggested to increase our understanding of effective and scalable interventions that facilitate collective shifts towards more sustainable dietary behaviors.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
Cardiovascular Institute of the South (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.