“An Automaton of Duty”? Some Remarks on Nietzsche’s Kant-Critique

Friedrich Nietzsche belongs to the sharpest opponents of Kant’s practical philosophy. From his naturalistic perspective he subjects Kant to an uncompromising, gradually sharpening critique. The paper concentrates on selected aspects of this critique and asks a simple question, namely whether Nietzsche’s direct anti-Kantian passages contribute anything relevant to a substantive discussion of the core of Kant’s practical philosophy. Therefore, the interpretation focuses on Nietzsche’s direct references to selected motifs of Kant’s ethics with the aim of identifying the substantive core hidden behind the rhetorical expressions. This core refers to the four motifs that structure the interpretation: 1. duty, 2. imperative, 3. autonomy, and 4. the intelligible world. I argue for a negative answer to the main question, but at the same time I try to show not only a specific proximity of the two concepts of autonomy but also the possibility of understanding Nietzsche’s “autonomy of the body” as a continuous extension of the autonomy of pure will.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Filozofia
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2025.80.2.2
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“An Automaton of Duty”? Some Remarks on Nietzsche’s Kant-Critique

Ondřej Sikora
Filozofia
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

“An Automaton of Duty”? Some Remarks on Nietzsche’s Kant-Critique

Ondřej Sikora
article en

Abstract

Friedrich Nietzsche belongs to the sharpest opponents of Kant’s practical philosophy. From his naturalistic perspective he subjects Kant to an uncompromising, gradually sharpening critique. The paper concentrates on selected aspects of this critique and asks a simple question, namely whether Nietzsche’s direct anti-Kantian passages contribute anything relevant to a substantive discussion of the core of Kant’s practical philosophy. Therefore, the interpretation focuses on Nietzsche’s direct references to selected motifs of Kant’s ethics with the aim of identifying the substantive core hidden behind the rhetorical expressions. This core refers to the four motifs that structure the interpretation: 1. duty, 2. imperative, 3. autonomy, and 4. the intelligible world. I argue for a negative answer to the main question, but at the same time I try to show not only a specific proximity of the two concepts of autonomy but also the possibility of understanding Nietzsche’s “autonomy of the body” as a continuous extension of the autonomy of pure will.

FilozofiaVol. 80(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“An Automaton of Duty”? Some Remarks on Nietzsche’s Kant-Critique — Ondřej Sikora · Filozofia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS