Assessment of the impacts of climate change on groundwater evapotranspiration in mid-to-high latitude regions

• Surface and groundwater (GW) contribution to AET was modelled by HydroGeoSphere. • Over 40% of the mean annual AET in riverine areas is supplied by GW. • GWET makes up over 80% of AET in areas with shallow GW, high PET, and perennial long-rooted plants. • Simulating CO 2 -related stomatal resistance is crucial for projecting future GWET. • Future AET rise in the Foothills and Plains depletes GW levels in these regions. In arid and semi-arid regions of mid-to-high latitude zones, actual evapotranspiration (AET) dominates the water balance, posing risks to the hydrologic budget and leading to potential groundwater depletion. Despite numerous studies on AET, the evapotranspiration from groundwater (GWET) and surface water (SWET) remains poorly understood at a regional scale. This study developed, calibrated, and validated an integrated surface and groundwater model to study AET in the North Saskatchewan River Basin (NSRB) in western Canada, covering historical (1983-2013) and mid-future (2043-2073) periods. The study addresses the temporal variation and feedback mechanisms affecting AET and its water sources across different ecohydro(geo)logical (EHG) regions often present in large watersheds, including Mountains, Foothills, and Plains. Results show that subsurface transpiration and evaporation are the primary contributors to AET, while surface water evaporation contributes the least across all EHG regions. In terms of water sources, SW is the largest contributor to AET in most areas across all EHG regions. However, GW is the primary source of water contributing to AET in riparian areas and regions with high atmospheric evapotranspiration demand, large Leaf Area Index, and deep-rooted plants accessing shallow groundwater. In the mid-future period, AET is projected to increase across the NSRB, with the greatest change occurring in the Mountains. In riparian areas and discharge zones of northeast Plains, GWET contribution is expected to increase. However, in the Foothills and Plains, the projected increases in AET may lead to groundwater depletion, reducing the amount of GWET. The most significant future impacts on groundwater are anticipated in the Plains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133294
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the impacts of climate change on groundwater evapotranspiration in mid-to-high latitude regions

Daniel S. Alessi, Brian Smerdon, Monireh Faramarzi
3 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Cryospheric studies and observations
3.90
article

Assessment of the impacts of climate change on groundwater evapotranspiration in mid-to-high latitude regions

Daniel S. Alessi, Brian Smerdon, Monireh Faramarzi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Surface and groundwater (GW) contribution to AET was modelled by HydroGeoSphere. • Over 40% of the mean annual AET in riverine areas is supplied by GW. • GWET makes up over 80% of AET in areas with shallow GW, high PET, and perennial long-rooted plants. • Simulating CO 2 -related stomatal resistance is crucial for projecting future GWET. • Future AET rise in the Foothills and Plains depletes GW levels in these regions. In arid and semi-arid regions of mid-to-high latitude zones, actual evapotranspiration (AET) dominates the water balance, posing risks to the hydrologic budget and leading to potential groundwater depletion. Despite numerous studies on AET, the evapotranspiration from groundwater (GWET) and surface water (SWET) remains poorly understood at a regional scale. This study developed, calibrated, and validated an integrated surface and groundwater model to study AET in the North Saskatchewan River Basin (NSRB) in western Canada, covering historical (1983-2013) and mid-future (2043-2073) periods. The study addresses the temporal variation and feedback mechanisms affecting AET and its water sources across different ecohydro(geo)logical (EHG) regions often present in large watersheds, including Mountains, Foothills, and Plains. Results show that subsurface transpiration and evaporation are the primary contributors to AET, while surface water evaporation contributes the least across all EHG regions. In terms of water sources, SW is the largest contributor to AET in most areas across all EHG regions. However, GW is the primary source of water contributing to AET in riparian areas and regions with high atmospheric evapotranspiration demand, large Leaf Area Index, and deep-rooted plants accessing shallow groundwater. In the mid-future period, AET is projected to increase across the NSRB, with the greatest change occurring in the Mountains. In riparian areas and discharge zones of northeast Plains, GWET contribution is expected to increase. However, in the Foothills and Plains, the projected increases in AET may lead to groundwater depletion, reducing the amount of GWET. The most significant future impacts on groundwater are anticipated in the Plains.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 660
University of Alberta (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cryospheric studies and observations
3.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.