Robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting with R-One <sup>TM</sup> : Feasibility and safety assessment in patients with carotid web lesions

PurposeRobotic-assisted carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures are on the rise and have demonstrated benefits compared to manual intervention. The R-OneTM robotic platform has demonstrated safety and efficacy for percutaneous coronary interventions, but its utility for procedures in the common carotid artery has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to assess the feasibility and initial safety of the R-OneTM robotic platform for treating patients with carotid artery disease (CAD) presenting with carotid web-diaphragm lesions.MethodsThe prospective CArotid Robotic procedure Evaluation study included patients with CAD suitable for CAS. The primary endpoint was procedure technical success, defined as the absence of any unplanned manual assistance or conversion to manual CAS for procedural completion. Secondary endpoints included the absence of intra-procedural complications, primary operator radiation exposure, patient radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast volume.ResultsA total of seven patients were enrolled (mean age: 49.57 ± 13.10 years; 5 females). Procedure technical success rate was 85.7% (6/7). The absence of intra-procedural complications rate was 100%. Mean overall procedure time was 41.71 ± 9.83 min, mean robotic procedure time was 15.86 ± 7.60 min, and mean CAS procedure time was 27.14 ± 8.71 min. The average patient radiation exposure dose was 135.50 ± 78.88 mGy. The mean overall procedure contrast volume was 68.14 ± 20.14 mL, and the mean robotic procedure contrast volume was 1.43 ± 3.78 mL.ConclusionCAS procedures using R-OneTM are feasible and safe with a good technical success rate without complications. To confirm these findings, larger multi-center trials with a diverse range of patients are necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Neuroradiology
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251332408
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting with R-One TM : Feasibility and safety assessment in patients with carotid web lesions

François Eugène, Quentin Alias, Julien Boucherit, Jean-Christophe Ferré et al.
Interventional Neuroradiology
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting with R-One TM : Feasibility and safety assessment in patients with carotid web lesions

François Eugène, Quentin Alias, Julien Boucherit, Jean-Christophe Ferré, Jean-Yves Gauvrit
article en

Abstract

PurposeRobotic-assisted carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures are on the rise and have demonstrated benefits compared to manual intervention. The R-OneTM robotic platform has demonstrated safety and efficacy for percutaneous coronary interventions, but its utility for procedures in the common carotid artery has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to assess the feasibility and initial safety of the R-OneTM robotic platform for treating patients with carotid artery disease (CAD) presenting with carotid web-diaphragm lesions.MethodsThe prospective CArotid Robotic procedure Evaluation study included patients with CAD suitable for CAS. The primary endpoint was procedure technical success, defined as the absence of any unplanned manual assistance or conversion to manual CAS for procedural completion. Secondary endpoints included the absence of intra-procedural complications, primary operator radiation exposure, patient radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast volume.ResultsA total of seven patients were enrolled (mean age: 49.57 ± 13.10 years; 5 females). Procedure technical success rate was 85.7% (6/7). The absence of intra-procedural complications rate was 100%. Mean overall procedure time was 41.71 ± 9.83 min, mean robotic procedure time was 15.86 ± 7.60 min, and mean CAS procedure time was 27.14 ± 8.71 min. The average patient radiation exposure dose was 135.50 ± 78.88 mGy. The mean overall procedure contrast volume was 68.14 ± 20.14 mL, and the mean robotic procedure contrast volume was 1.43 ± 3.78 mL.ConclusionCAS procedures using R-OneTM are feasible and safe with a good technical success rate without complications. To confirm these findings, larger multi-center trials with a diverse range of patients are necessary.

Interventional Neuroradiology
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting with R-One <sup>TM</sup> : Feasibility and safety assessment in patients with carotid web lesions — François Eugène, Quentin Alias, et al. · Interventional Neuroradiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS