Students as Co-Authors: Achievement Emotions, Beliefs About Writing, and OER Publishing Decisions

Faculty interest in open educational resources (OER) and open pedagogy has grown over the past several years. The current study examined how achievement emotions and beliefs about writing influenced students’ decisions to publish their work in an OER. Students in two online undergraduate psychology courses worked in groups to write papers on marginalized pioneering psychologists, with the option to contribute their work as chapters in an OER (hosted on Pressbooks). After the project, students (N = 68) completed a survey that included measures of achievement emotions, beliefs about writing, demographic items, and questions about their decision to publish. A majority (61.8%) of students decided to publish their work as chapters in the OER. Those who chose to publish reported significantly less shame and significantly more pride, enjoyment, and positive beliefs about writing. Overall, the findings are informative for faculty using writing-intensive forms of open pedagogy in their courses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Praxis
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.745
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students as Co-Authors: Achievement Emotions, Beliefs About Writing, and OER Publishing Decisions

Alison E. Kelly, Brittany N. Avila, Alissa C. Schell
Open Praxis
Reflective Practices in Education
article

Students as Co-Authors: Achievement Emotions, Beliefs About Writing, and OER Publishing Decisions

Alison E. Kelly, Brittany N. Avila, Alissa C. Schell
article en

Abstract

Faculty interest in open educational resources (OER) and open pedagogy has grown over the past several years. The current study examined how achievement emotions and beliefs about writing influenced students’ decisions to publish their work in an OER. Students in two online undergraduate psychology courses worked in groups to write papers on marginalized pioneering psychologists, with the option to contribute their work as chapters in an OER (hosted on Pressbooks). After the project, students (N = 68) completed a survey that included measures of achievement emotions, beliefs about writing, demographic items, and questions about their decision to publish. A majority (61.8%) of students decided to publish their work as chapters in the OER. Those who chose to publish reported significantly less shame and significantly more pride, enjoyment, and positive beliefs about writing. Overall, the findings are informative for faculty using writing-intensive forms of open pedagogy in their courses.

Open PraxisVol. 17(1)
University of North Dakota (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Reflective Practices in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Students as Co-Authors: Achievement Emotions, Beliefs About Writing, and OER Publishing Decisions — Alison E. Kelly, Brittany N. Avila, et al. · Open Praxis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS