‘Flight Crew v. Cabin Crew – One of these things is not like the other’: A critical reflection on <i>Air Nostrum C-314/23</i>

In October 2024, the Court of Justice in Air Nostrum C-314/23 delivered a judgment on the issue of meal allowance for the flight and cabin crew of the Spanish airline Air Nostrum. The cabin crew (predominantly women) received a significantly lower daily subsistence allowance than the flight crew (predominantly men). The Court operationalised a formal equality approach in its decision. This article highlights three main issues involved in the case: broader interpretation of pay; indirect discrimination based on sex; as well as separate collective bargaining agreements for the flight and cabin crews. Lastly, it discusses the horizontal segregation in the aviation sector against the backdrop of this case. It highlights the manner in which the decision could have included the dimension of substantive equality taking into account such occupational segregation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Labour Law Journal
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525251332920
Primary Topic
International Law and Aviation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Flight Crew v. Cabin Crew – One of these things is not like the other’: A critical reflection on Air Nostrum C-314/23

Neha Vyas
European Labour Law Journal
International Law and Aviation
article

‘Flight Crew v. Cabin Crew – One of these things is not like the other’: A critical reflection on Air Nostrum C-314/23

Neha Vyas
article en

Abstract

In October 2024, the Court of Justice in Air Nostrum C-314/23 delivered a judgment on the issue of meal allowance for the flight and cabin crew of the Spanish airline Air Nostrum. The cabin crew (predominantly women) received a significantly lower daily subsistence allowance than the flight crew (predominantly men). The Court operationalised a formal equality approach in its decision. This article highlights three main issues involved in the case: broader interpretation of pay; indirect discrimination based on sex; as well as separate collective bargaining agreements for the flight and cabin crews. Lastly, it discusses the horizontal segregation in the aviation sector against the backdrop of this case. It highlights the manner in which the decision could have included the dimension of substantive equality taking into account such occupational segregation.

European Labour Law JournalVol. 16(3)
Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
International Law and Aviation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.