Neural personal information and its legal protection: evidence from China

The rapid advancements in neuroscience highlight the pressing need to safeguard neural personal information (NPI). China has achieved significant progress in brain-computer interface technology and its clinical applications. Considering the intrinsic vulnerability of NPI and the paucity of legal scrutiny concerning NPI breaches, a thorough assessment of the adequacy of China's personal information protection legislation is essential. This analysis contends that NPI should be classified as sensitive personal information. The absence of bespoke provisions for NPI in current legislation underscores persistent challenges in its protection. To address these gaps, this work proposes the establishment of a concentric-circle hard-soft law continuum to support a hybrid governance model for NPI, rooted in fundamental human rights principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaf006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural personal information and its legal protection: evidence from China

Bin Kai Wei, Shujun Cheng, Yang Feng
1 citations
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Cognitive Functions and Memory
2.12
article

Neural personal information and its legal protection: evidence from China

Bin Kai Wei, Shujun Cheng, Yang Feng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancements in neuroscience highlight the pressing need to safeguard neural personal information (NPI). China has achieved significant progress in brain-computer interface technology and its clinical applications. Considering the intrinsic vulnerability of NPI and the paucity of legal scrutiny concerning NPI breaches, a thorough assessment of the adequacy of China's personal information protection legislation is essential. This analysis contends that NPI should be classified as sensitive personal information. The absence of bespoke provisions for NPI in current legislation underscores persistent challenges in its protection. To address these gaps, this work proposes the establishment of a concentric-circle hard-soft law continuum to support a hybrid governance model for NPI, rooted in fundamental human rights principles.

Journal of Law and the BiosciencesVol. 12(1)
Zhejiang University (CN)
Ministry of Education, India, Zhejiang University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.