Innovation newness shaping venture legitimation strategy choices in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: An empirical analysis based on fsQCA
Establishing and sustaining the legitimacy of new ventures is a complex endeavour for entrepreneurs. In this article , we draw insights on ecosystem and legitimacy theories, and we employ a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach to study effective configurations of (technological and market) innovation newness influencing the new-venture legitimation strategy orientations of 228 startups in Finland. The results reveal that the startups operating in established markets (existing markets) with incremental technology (as essential [core] conditions) are likely to opt for conformance and selection legitimation strategies. However, a firm's radical technology has been revealed as a supplementary (peripheral) condition in this context. Furthermore, the results show that startups are likely to opt for a manipulation strategy when operating in new markets (as a core condition, with incremental technology as a peripheral condition). We further find that startups can opt for a creation strategy when operating in new markets with radical technology (as core conditions). We conclude by offering the implications of our findings and avenues for further research.
Authors
- Jonathan Mukiza Kansheba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4399-7069)
- Abdollah Mohammadparast Tabas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-9851)
- Clavis Nwehfor Fubah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-3393)
- Christina Theodoraki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-5630)
Institutions
- University of Agder (NO)
- Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
- University of North Carolina at Pembroke (US)
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- University of Oulu (FI)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
- Published
- 2025-04-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503251330088
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.76