Is Money Supply Endogenous a Markov-Switch Exploration in the Zero Lower Bound Interest Rate in the USA

Abstract This paper employs a Markov switch dynamic regression model to analyze money supply dynamics and interest rates in the U.S. from 2000 to 2023. The analysis identifies two distinct monetary regimes. In State 1, with lower interest rates, deficiencies in M2 variables challenge prevailing notions of endogeneity, suggesting exogeneity. State 2, reflecting higher interest rates, affirms the Federal Reserve’s exogenous control over the money supply. The inverse relationship between the money supply growth rate and interest rates supports the pivotal role of the Federal Reserve. Identifying two states contributes to theories about economic regime shifts, emphasizing the need for adaptive policymaking. Policymakers should consider state-specific strategies and incorporate money supply variables into risk management frameworks. Continuous evaluation of monetary policy effectiveness and alignment with observed impacts on money supply, stock, and interest rates is recommended for optimal economic outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Economics
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2024-0026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Money Supply Endogenous a Markov-Switch Exploration in the Zero Lower Bound Interest Rate in the USA

Eugene Msizi Buthelezi
1 citations
Review of Economics
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
0.83
article

Is Money Supply Endogenous a Markov-Switch Exploration in the Zero Lower Bound Interest Rate in the USA

Eugene Msizi Buthelezi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper employs a Markov switch dynamic regression model to analyze money supply dynamics and interest rates in the U.S. from 2000 to 2023. The analysis identifies two distinct monetary regimes. In State 1, with lower interest rates, deficiencies in M2 variables challenge prevailing notions of endogeneity, suggesting exogeneity. State 2, reflecting higher interest rates, affirms the Federal Reserve’s exogenous control over the money supply. The inverse relationship between the money supply growth rate and interest rates supports the pivotal role of the Federal Reserve. Identifying two states contributes to theories about economic regime shifts, emphasizing the need for adaptive policymaking. Policymakers should consider state-specific strategies and incorporate money supply variables into risk management frameworks. Continuous evaluation of monetary policy effectiveness and alignment with observed impacts on money supply, stock, and interest rates is recommended for optimal economic outcomes.

Review of EconomicsVol. 75(3)
University of the Free State (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.