eSLOE 2.0: Examining Data From the First 2 Application Cycles of the Updated Emergency Medicine Electronic Standardized Letter of Evaluation

<b>Background</b> The emergency medicine (EM) Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) was created to provide a standardized, concise, and differentiated evaluation of EM residency applicants. It was revised in 2022 (eSLOE 2.0) to better align with the shift toward competency-based evaluations in undergraduate and graduate medical education. <b>Objective</b> To investigate how applicants were rated by evaluators on the new competency-based component and revised normative-based components of the eSLOE 2.0 and to establish preliminary validity for the new letter format. <b>Methods</b> Data from the first 2 application cycles utilizing the eSLOE 2.0 (2022-2023, 2023-2024) were accessed via a national EM database. The data specifically from parts A (core EM clinical skills), B (professionalism and interpersonal skills), and C (anticipated guidance during residency and rank list placement) were examined. <b>Results</b> Data from the 11 789 letters, representing 6543 unique applicants, revealed that 44.8% to 71.7% of applicants were designated as fully entrustable, and 27% to 50.7% as mostly entrustable on part A skills. Most applicants (81.7% to 85.7%) were placed as either 4 or 5 (1-5 Likert scale) in each part B skill. Nearly fifty-two percent (n=6076) were anticipated to need standard guidance in residency, while 32.8% (n=3872) were anticipated to need minimal guidance and 15.6% (n=1841) to need moderate or most guidance. In part C, 20.5% (n=2414) were designated as being in the top 10% on the rank list, 37.2% (n=4381) in the top third, 31.6% (n=3727) in the middle third, and 10.0% (n=1178) in the lower third. <b>Conclusions</b> The findings from the first 2 years of utilizing the eSLOE 2.0 format offer preliminary validity data on this new letter format.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-24-00501.1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

eSLOE 2.0: Examining Data From the First 2 Application Cycles of the Updated Emergency Medicine Electronic Standardized Letter of Evaluation

Joseph House, Doug Franzen, Katherine M. Hiller, Cullen Hegarty et al.
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

eSLOE 2.0: Examining Data From the First 2 Application Cycles of the Updated Emergency Medicine Electronic Standardized Letter of Evaluation

Joseph House, Doug Franzen, Katherine M. Hiller, Cullen Hegarty, Sharon Bord, Erin Karl, Kevin Hamilton, Alexis Pelletier‐Bui
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b> The emergency medicine (EM) Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) was created to provide a standardized, concise, and differentiated evaluation of EM residency applicants. It was revised in 2022 (eSLOE 2.0) to better align with the shift toward competency-based evaluations in undergraduate and graduate medical education. <b>Objective</b> To investigate how applicants were rated by evaluators on the new competency-based component and revised normative-based components of the eSLOE 2.0 and to establish preliminary validity for the new letter format. <b>Methods</b> Data from the first 2 application cycles utilizing the eSLOE 2.0 (2022-2023, 2023-2024) were accessed via a national EM database. The data specifically from parts A (core EM clinical skills), B (professionalism and interpersonal skills), and C (anticipated guidance during residency and rank list placement) were examined. <b>Results</b> Data from the 11 789 letters, representing 6543 unique applicants, revealed that 44.8% to 71.7% of applicants were designated as fully entrustable, and 27% to 50.7% as mostly entrustable on part A skills. Most applicants (81.7% to 85.7%) were placed as either 4 or 5 (1-5 Likert scale) in each part B skill. Nearly fifty-two percent (n=6076) were anticipated to need standard guidance in residency, while 32.8% (n=3872) were anticipated to need minimal guidance and 15.6% (n=1841) to need moderate or most guidance. In part C, 20.5% (n=2414) were designated as being in the top 10% on the rank list, 37.2% (n=4381) in the top third, 31.6% (n=3727) in the middle third, and 10.0% (n=1178) in the lower third. <b>Conclusions</b> The findings from the first 2 years of utilizing the eSLOE 2.0 format offer preliminary validity data on this new letter format.

Journal of Graduate Medical EducationVol. 17(2)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Regions Hospital (US), Indiana University Health (US), University of Minnesota (US), University of Maryland Medical System (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Cooper University Hospital (US), Hennepin County Medical Center (US), Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), HealthPartners (US)
University of Minnesota, University of Washington, Johns Hopkins University, Hennepin County Medical Center, Indiana University Health, Rowan University, Medical School, University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Indiana University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.