eSLOE 2.0: Examining Data From the First 2 Application Cycles of the Updated Emergency Medicine Electronic Standardized Letter of Evaluation
<b>Background</b> The emergency medicine (EM) Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) was created to provide a standardized, concise, and differentiated evaluation of EM residency applicants. It was revised in 2022 (eSLOE 2.0) to better align with the shift toward competency-based evaluations in undergraduate and graduate medical education. <b>Objective</b> To investigate how applicants were rated by evaluators on the new competency-based component and revised normative-based components of the eSLOE 2.0 and to establish preliminary validity for the new letter format. <b>Methods</b> Data from the first 2 application cycles utilizing the eSLOE 2.0 (2022-2023, 2023-2024) were accessed via a national EM database. The data specifically from parts A (core EM clinical skills), B (professionalism and interpersonal skills), and C (anticipated guidance during residency and rank list placement) were examined. <b>Results</b> Data from the 11 789 letters, representing 6543 unique applicants, revealed that 44.8% to 71.7% of applicants were designated as fully entrustable, and 27% to 50.7% as mostly entrustable on part A skills. Most applicants (81.7% to 85.7%) were placed as either 4 or 5 (1-5 Likert scale) in each part B skill. Nearly fifty-two percent (n=6076) were anticipated to need standard guidance in residency, while 32.8% (n=3872) were anticipated to need minimal guidance and 15.6% (n=1841) to need moderate or most guidance. In part C, 20.5% (n=2414) were designated as being in the top 10% on the rank list, 37.2% (n=4381) in the top third, 31.6% (n=3727) in the middle third, and 10.0% (n=1178) in the lower third. <b>Conclusions</b> The findings from the first 2 years of utilizing the eSLOE 2.0 format offer preliminary validity data on this new letter format.
Authors
- Joseph House (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-3845)
- Doug Franzen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4350-8678)
- Katherine M. Hiller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7343-852X)
- Cullen Hegarty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7249-8675)
- Sharon Bord (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5987-4139)
- Erin Karl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9860-7051)
- Kevin Hamilton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3560-8097)
- Alexis Pelletier‐Bui (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-4123)
Institutions
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Regions Hospital (US)
- Indiana University Health (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Maryland Medical System (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- Cooper University Hospital (US)
- Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- HealthPartners (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Graduate Medical Education
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-24-00501.1
- Primary Topic
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Minnesota
- University of Washington
- Johns Hopkins University
- Hennepin County Medical Center
- Indiana University Health
- Rowan University
- Medical School, University of Michigan
- School of Medicine, Indiana University