Expert consensus on approaches to risk stratification and choice of therapy in patients with inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

On December 13, 2024, the final working group meeting was held, the purpose of which was to discuss the common position of experts on the problem of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension of various specialties: cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, pulmonologists, on issues of assessing the operability of patients, risk stratification and choice of therapy in patients with inoperable and residual forms of pathology. The discussion field included a wide range of issues that often arise in real clinical practice, but specific answers to them are not given in national and foreign guidelines. On November 8, 2024, at the preparatory stage, 16 experts under the leadership of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences I.E. Chazova (chairman) formulated questions for the preparation of a consensus document (without discussion), consistently discussing the feasibility of including each issue in the document and distributing tasks for the final session. Then, at the intermediate stage, experts searched and systematized scientific information on the formulated questions in the PubMed and eLIBRARY systems to prepare sections of the document in accordance with the established tasks. When finalizing the document, experts answered 28 questions: during anonymous voting an individual score was determined for each block from 1 - completely disagree, to 5 - completely agree. It was considered that a strong consensus was achieved with a mean score of <i>M</i>±<i>m</i> 2.5±2, and with a mean score below 2.5, consensus was not achieved. A strong consensus was reached on all issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Terapevticheskii arkhiv
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26442/00403660.2025.03.203237
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert consensus on approaches to risk stratification and choice of therapy in patients with inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Alexander G. Edemskiy, И Е Чазова, T. V. Martynyuk, Sergey Nikolaevich Avdeev et al.
1 citations
Terapevticheskii arkhiv
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
1.52
article

Expert consensus on approaches to risk stratification and choice of therapy in patients with inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Alexander G. Edemskiy, И Е Чазова, T. V. Martynyuk, Sergey Nikolaevich Avdeev, N. M. Danilov, К. В. Мершин, V. V. Gramovich, A. М. Chernyavskiy, А. Л. Комаров, О. М. Моисеева, Denis S. Grankin, З. С. Валиева, Т. Н. Веселова, S. Yu. Yarovoy, O. Ya. Vasiltseva, Natalia А. Царева
article en
1 citations

Abstract

On December 13, 2024, the final working group meeting was held, the purpose of which was to discuss the common position of experts on the problem of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension of various specialties: cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, pulmonologists, on issues of assessing the operability of patients, risk stratification and choice of therapy in patients with inoperable and residual forms of pathology. The discussion field included a wide range of issues that often arise in real clinical practice, but specific answers to them are not given in national and foreign guidelines. On November 8, 2024, at the preparatory stage, 16 experts under the leadership of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences I.E. Chazova (chairman) formulated questions for the preparation of a consensus document (without discussion), consistently discussing the feasibility of including each issue in the document and distributing tasks for the final session. Then, at the intermediate stage, experts searched and systematized scientific information on the formulated questions in the PubMed and eLIBRARY systems to prepare sections of the document in accordance with the established tasks. When finalizing the document, experts answered 28 questions: during anonymous voting an individual score was determined for each block from 1 - completely disagree, to 5 - completely agree. It was considered that a strong consensus was achieved with a mean score of <i>M</i>±<i>m</i> 2.5±2, and with a mean score below 2.5, consensus was not achieved. A strong consensus was reached on all issues.

Terapevticheskii arkhivVol. 97(3)
Sechenov University (RU), Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU), National Medical Research Center of Cardiology (RU), Meshalkin National Medical Research Center (RU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.