Fairness Challenges in the Design of Machine Learning Applications for Healthcare

Machine learning-augmented applications have the potential to be powerful tools for decision-making in healthcare. However, healthcare is a complex domain that presents many challenges. These challenges, such as medical errors, clinician–patient relationships and treatment preferences, must be addressed to ensure fairness in ML-augmented healthcare applications. To better understand the influence these challenges have on fairness, 16 experienced engineers and designers with domain knowledge in healthcare technology were interviewed about how they would prioritise fairness in 3 healthcare scenarios (well-being improvement, chronic illness management, acute illness treatment). Using a template analysis, this work identifies the key considerations in the creation of fair ML for healthcare. These considerations clustered into categories related to technology, healthcare context and user perspectives. To explore these categories, we propose the stakeholder fairness conceptual model. This framework aids designers and developers in understanding the complex considerations that stem from the building, management and evaluation of ML-augmented healthcare applications, and how they affect the expectations of fairness. This work then discusses how this model may be applied when the health technology is directly provisioned to users, without a healthcare provider managing its use or adoption. This article contributes to the understanding of fairness requirements in healthcare, including the effect of healthcare errors, clinician-application collaboration and how the evaluation of healthcare technology becomes part of the fairness design process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3728368
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness Challenges in the Design of Machine Learning Applications for Healthcare

Robert Bowman, Seamus Ryan, Wanling Cai, Gavin Doherty
ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Fairness Challenges in the Design of Machine Learning Applications for Healthcare

Robert Bowman, Seamus Ryan, Wanling Cai, Gavin Doherty
article en

Abstract

Machine learning-augmented applications have the potential to be powerful tools for decision-making in healthcare. However, healthcare is a complex domain that presents many challenges. These challenges, such as medical errors, clinician–patient relationships and treatment preferences, must be addressed to ensure fairness in ML-augmented healthcare applications. To better understand the influence these challenges have on fairness, 16 experienced engineers and designers with domain knowledge in healthcare technology were interviewed about how they would prioritise fairness in 3 healthcare scenarios (well-being improvement, chronic illness management, acute illness treatment). Using a template analysis, this work identifies the key considerations in the creation of fair ML for healthcare. These considerations clustered into categories related to technology, healthcare context and user perspectives. To explore these categories, we propose the stakeholder fairness conceptual model. This framework aids designers and developers in understanding the complex considerations that stem from the building, management and evaluation of ML-augmented healthcare applications, and how they affect the expectations of fairness. This work then discusses how this model may be applied when the health technology is directly provisioned to users, without a healthcare provider managing its use or adoption. This article contributes to the understanding of fairness requirements in healthcare, including the effect of healthcare errors, clinician-application collaboration and how the evaluation of healthcare technology becomes part of the fairness design process.

ACM Transactions on Computing for HealthcareVol. 6(4)
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.