Demographic Differences Between Applicants Who Submitted Rank Order Lists and Applicants Who Matched in 2022 and 2023

<b>Background</b> Resident selection processes may alter the representation of applicants with certain demographic characteristics. The impact of potential biases at each phase of selection should be examined. <b>Objective</b> To investigate the differences between applicants who submit rank order lists (ROLs) and applicants who match in the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Main Residency Match. <b>Methods</b> We analyzed publicly available NRMP data for the 2022 and 2023 Matches to compare self-reported sex, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, disability status, and citizenship between applicants who submitted ROLs and applicants who matched. <b>Results</b> Of the 73 426 applicants who submitted ROLs, 60 655 applicants matched. A higher percentage of matched applicants were female as compared to those who submitted ROLs (+2.0%, 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5). A higher percentage of matched applicants identified as bisexual (+0.2%, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.4), whereas a lower percentage of matched applicants identified as heterosexual (-0.4%, 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1). White applicants represented a higher percentage of matched applicants (+2.9%, 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.4), whereas Asian and Black/African American applicants comprised lower percentages of matched applicants as compared to all applicants (Asian: -1.5%, 95% CI, -2 to -1; Black/African American: -0.6%, 95% CI, -1 to -0.3). Hispanic/Latino and non-US citizens also comprised lower percentages of matched applicants (Hispanic/Latino: -0.5%, 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.1; non-US citizen: -4.9%, 95% CI, -5.3 to -4.5). There was no difference for applicants with disabilities. <b>Conclusions</b> Differences exist between the demographics of applicants who submitted ROLs compared to those who matched.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-24-00512.1
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demographic Differences Between Applicants Who Submitted Rank Order Lists and Applicants Who Matched in 2022 and 2023

Jenny Chen, Francis Deng
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Demographic Differences Between Applicants Who Submitted Rank Order Lists and Applicants Who Matched in 2022 and 2023

Jenny Chen, Francis Deng
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b> Resident selection processes may alter the representation of applicants with certain demographic characteristics. The impact of potential biases at each phase of selection should be examined. <b>Objective</b> To investigate the differences between applicants who submit rank order lists (ROLs) and applicants who match in the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Main Residency Match. <b>Methods</b> We analyzed publicly available NRMP data for the 2022 and 2023 Matches to compare self-reported sex, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, disability status, and citizenship between applicants who submitted ROLs and applicants who matched. <b>Results</b> Of the 73 426 applicants who submitted ROLs, 60 655 applicants matched. A higher percentage of matched applicants were female as compared to those who submitted ROLs (+2.0%, 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5). A higher percentage of matched applicants identified as bisexual (+0.2%, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.4), whereas a lower percentage of matched applicants identified as heterosexual (-0.4%, 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1). White applicants represented a higher percentage of matched applicants (+2.9%, 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.4), whereas Asian and Black/African American applicants comprised lower percentages of matched applicants as compared to all applicants (Asian: -1.5%, 95% CI, -2 to -1; Black/African American: -0.6%, 95% CI, -1 to -0.3). Hispanic/Latino and non-US citizens also comprised lower percentages of matched applicants (Hispanic/Latino: -0.5%, 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.1; non-US citizen: -4.9%, 95% CI, -5.3 to -4.5). There was no difference for applicants with disabilities. <b>Conclusions</b> Differences exist between the demographics of applicants who submitted ROLs compared to those who matched.

Journal of Graduate Medical EducationVol. 17(2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Johns Hopkins University, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.