An Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Student Performance Evaluation Clerkship Narratives: Insights From the PRIME+ Framework

<b>Background</b> Despite existing guidelines for writing clerkship summative assessment narratives, their quality, structure, and utility remain variable. Categorizing Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) narratives using a framework can reveal patterns and gaps in content, offering actionable insights. <b>Objective</b> This study aimed to (1) categorize MSPE narrative comments using the PRIME+ framework (professionalism, reporting, interpreting, managing, and educating, and areas for improvement [+]), and (2) examine differences in length and content by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final clerkship grade. <b>Methods</b> Seven hundred twenty applications to our obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency program in 2023 were reviewed, focusing on the OB/GYN core clerkship narrative. Narratives were categorized using the PRIME+ framework, and differences in length and content were assessed by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final grade. Differences between groups were evaluated with nonparametric tests. <b>Results</b> Six hundred fifty-three narratives from 231 medical schools were included. Fifty-one unique grading systems were reported. PRIME+ domains were represented as follows: professionalism (94.8%, 619 of 653), reporter (71.1%, 464 of 653), interpreter (37.5%, 245 of 653), manager (69.1%, 451 of 653), educator (69.7%, 455 of 653), and areas for improvement (3.7%, 24 of 653). For each domain, <13% of narratives included ≥1 specific example. Median word count differed between US-based (155 words; 95% CI, 148-162) and international (61 words; 95% CI, 51-75) applicants (<i>P</i>=.001). Students earning "honors" had longer narratives (median words 149; 95% CI, 131-164 vs 117; 95% CI, 97-134; <i>P</i>=.001) with more specific examples (1.2 examples; 95% CI, 0.97-1.4 vs 0.88; 95% CI, 0.53-1.2; <i>P</i>=.024) and advanced PRIME+ domains, specifically educator (<i>P</i>=.016). The number of specific examples differed by race (<i>P</i>=.02) but not gender. <b>Conclusions</b> MSPE narratives for the OB/GYN clerkship demonstrate variability in content and length.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-24-00660.1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Student Performance Evaluation Clerkship Narratives: Insights From the PRIME+ Framework

Marie Altendahl, Said S. Saab, Michelle Shui, Shireen Madani Sims et al.
2 citations
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
3.76
article

An Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Student Performance Evaluation Clerkship Narratives: Insights From the PRIME+ Framework

Marie Altendahl, Said S. Saab, Michelle Shui, Shireen Madani Sims, W.E. Armstrong, Anthony L. Shanks, Rini B. Ratan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b> Despite existing guidelines for writing clerkship summative assessment narratives, their quality, structure, and utility remain variable. Categorizing Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) narratives using a framework can reveal patterns and gaps in content, offering actionable insights. <b>Objective</b> This study aimed to (1) categorize MSPE narrative comments using the PRIME+ framework (professionalism, reporting, interpreting, managing, and educating, and areas for improvement [+]), and (2) examine differences in length and content by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final clerkship grade. <b>Methods</b> Seven hundred twenty applications to our obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency program in 2023 were reviewed, focusing on the OB/GYN core clerkship narrative. Narratives were categorized using the PRIME+ framework, and differences in length and content were assessed by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final grade. Differences between groups were evaluated with nonparametric tests. <b>Results</b> Six hundred fifty-three narratives from 231 medical schools were included. Fifty-one unique grading systems were reported. PRIME+ domains were represented as follows: professionalism (94.8%, 619 of 653), reporter (71.1%, 464 of 653), interpreter (37.5%, 245 of 653), manager (69.1%, 451 of 653), educator (69.7%, 455 of 653), and areas for improvement (3.7%, 24 of 653). For each domain, <13% of narratives included ≥1 specific example. Median word count differed between US-based (155 words; 95% CI, 148-162) and international (61 words; 95% CI, 51-75) applicants (<i>P</i>=.001). Students earning "honors" had longer narratives (median words 149; 95% CI, 131-164 vs 117; 95% CI, 97-134; <i>P</i>=.001) with more specific examples (1.2 examples; 95% CI, 0.97-1.4 vs 0.88; 95% CI, 0.53-1.2; <i>P</i>=.024) and advanced PRIME+ domains, specifically educator (<i>P</i>=.016). The number of specific examples differed by race (<i>P</i>=.02) but not gender. <b>Conclusions</b> MSPE narratives for the OB/GYN clerkship demonstrate variability in content and length.

Journal of Graduate Medical EducationVol. 17(2)
Northwestern University (US), University of Florida (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Columbia University (US), Florida College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovations in Medical Education
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.