A Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classification Algorithms for Imbalanced and Balanced Rodent Tuber Dataset with Random Oversampling Method

Class distributions that are assumed to be balanced by conventional machine learning algorithms make them susceptible to biases that favor the dominant class throughout the classification process. This study primarily discusses how classification results may be impacted by the dataset’s state, whether it is balanced or unbalanced. The Rodent Tuber’s unbalanced dataset, which includes chemical data useful for cancer diagnosis, was utilized in this investigation. Support Vector Machine with three kernels and Random Forest will be used to classify this dataset. To see the differences, Random Oversampling is used to do classification on both an imbalanced and balanced dataset. The outcomes demonstrate that better results with shorter running times are obtained from a balanced dataset. The Random Forest method yielded the best classification results on the balanced dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icic64337.2024.10956313
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classification Algorithms for Imbalanced and Balanced Rodent Tuber Dataset with Random Oversampling Method

Iwan Binanto, Nesti Fronika Sianipar, Marselinus Sandimus Jamlu, Robertus Denyva Adibuana Wibisono
10 links
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

A Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classification Algorithms for Imbalanced and Balanced Rodent Tuber Dataset with Random Oversampling Method

Iwan Binanto, Nesti Fronika Sianipar, Marselinus Sandimus Jamlu, Robertus Denyva Adibuana Wibisono
article en

Abstract

Class distributions that are assumed to be balanced by conventional machine learning algorithms make them susceptible to biases that favor the dominant class throughout the classification process. This study primarily discusses how classification results may be impacted by the dataset’s state, whether it is balanced or unbalanced. The Rodent Tuber’s unbalanced dataset, which includes chemical data useful for cancer diagnosis, was utilized in this investigation. Support Vector Machine with three kernels and Random Forest will be used to classify this dataset. To see the differences, Random Oversampling is used to do classification on both an imbalanced and balanced dataset. The outcomes demonstrate that better results with shorter running times are obtained from a balanced dataset. The Random Forest method yielded the best classification results on the balanced dataset.

Binus University (ID), Sanata Dharma University (ID)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.