Owasp Zap vs Arachni: Which One is Better in Vulnerability Assesment?

Security testing is a crucial step in protecting information and ensuring that the software system meets security standards. To identify vulnerabilities, analysis with scanning tools like OWASP ZAP and Arachni is required. However, without a comprehensive understanding of the scope and criticality of vulnerabilities identified by these tools, it’s challenging to determine the accuracy and relevance of the results. Therefore, it is essential to perform thorough evaluations and benchmarking of vulnerability scanning tools to ensure they deliver reliable and accurate outcomes. This research aims to analyze and compare the performance of OWASP ZAP and Arachni in detecting vulnerabilities. The method used includes the preparation of testing equipment requirements, preparation of testing tools, vulnerability analysis, penetration testing, performance comparison of vulnerability scan tools, and performance evaluation of vulnerability scan tools. The results show that OWASP ZAP detected 16 vulnerabilities with a high level of consistency with the penetration testing results, while Arachni detected 9 vulnerabilities with lower consistency, making OWASP ZAP superior to Arachni.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icic64337.2024.10956935
Citations
1
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Owasp Zap vs Arachni: Which One is Better in Vulnerability Assesment?

Endang Sulistiyani, Achmad Muhaimin Irzan
1 citations
African studies and sociopolitical issues
1.13
article

Owasp Zap vs Arachni: Which One is Better in Vulnerability Assesment?

Endang Sulistiyani, Achmad Muhaimin Irzan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Security testing is a crucial step in protecting information and ensuring that the software system meets security standards. To identify vulnerabilities, analysis with scanning tools like OWASP ZAP and Arachni is required. However, without a comprehensive understanding of the scope and criticality of vulnerabilities identified by these tools, it’s challenging to determine the accuracy and relevance of the results. Therefore, it is essential to perform thorough evaluations and benchmarking of vulnerability scanning tools to ensure they deliver reliable and accurate outcomes. This research aims to analyze and compare the performance of OWASP ZAP and Arachni in detecting vulnerabilities. The method used includes the preparation of testing equipment requirements, preparation of testing tools, vulnerability analysis, penetration testing, performance comparison of vulnerability scan tools, and performance evaluation of vulnerability scan tools. The results show that OWASP ZAP detected 16 vulnerabilities with a high level of consistency with the penetration testing results, while Arachni detected 9 vulnerabilities with lower consistency, making OWASP ZAP superior to Arachni.

Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (ID), Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.