Perceptual learning improves discrimination but does not reduce distortions in appearance

Human perceptual sensitivity often improves with training, a phenomenon known as "perceptual learning." Another important perceptual dimension is appearance, the subjective sense of stimulus magnitude. Are training-induced improvements in sensitivity accompanied by more accurate appearance? Here, we examined this question by measuring both discrimination (sensitivity) and estimation (appearance) responses to near-horizontal motion directions, which are known to be repulsed away from horizontal. Participants performed discrimination and estimation tasks before and after training in either the discrimination or the estimation task or none (control group). Human observers who trained in either discrimination or estimation exhibited improvements in discrimination accuracy, but estimation repulsion did not decrease; instead, it either persisted or increased. Hence, distortions in perception can be exacerbated after perceptual learning. We developed a computational observer model in which perceptual learning arises from increases in the precision of underlying neural representations, which explains this counterintuitive finding. For each observer, the fitted model accounted for discrimination performance, the distribution of estimates, and their changes with training. Our empirical findings and modeling suggest that learning enhances distinctions between categories, a potentially important aspect of real-world perception and perceptual learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012980
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptual learning improves discrimination but does not reduce distortions in appearance

Sarit Szpiro, Marisa Carrasco, Charlie S. Burlingham, Eero P. Simoncelli
1 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
article

Perceptual learning improves discrimination but does not reduce distortions in appearance

Sarit Szpiro, Marisa Carrasco, Charlie S. Burlingham, Eero P. Simoncelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Human perceptual sensitivity often improves with training, a phenomenon known as "perceptual learning." Another important perceptual dimension is appearance, the subjective sense of stimulus magnitude. Are training-induced improvements in sensitivity accompanied by more accurate appearance? Here, we examined this question by measuring both discrimination (sensitivity) and estimation (appearance) responses to near-horizontal motion directions, which are known to be repulsed away from horizontal. Participants performed discrimination and estimation tasks before and after training in either the discrimination or the estimation task or none (control group). Human observers who trained in either discrimination or estimation exhibited improvements in discrimination accuracy, but estimation repulsion did not decrease; instead, it either persisted or increased. Hence, distortions in perception can be exacerbated after perceptual learning. We developed a computational observer model in which perceptual learning arises from increases in the precision of underlying neural representations, which explains this counterintuitive finding. For each observer, the fitted model accounted for discrimination performance, the distribution of estimates, and their changes with training. Our empirical findings and modeling suggest that learning enhances distinctions between categories, a potentially important aspect of real-world perception and perceptual learning.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 21(4)
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US), Simons Foundation (US), New York University (US), University of Haifa (IL)
Israel Science Foundation, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.