Using mixed-fidelity to create effective environments

Abstract User testing is crucial for ensuring that systems meet user expectations, involving both low- and high-fidelity prototypes. Recently, mixed-fidelity prototypes, which blend various levels of detail, have gained popularity but are mainly used for evaluating single digital prototypes. Typically, medical devices are tested only after engineering is complete, using high-fidelity prototypes in realistic environments. This paper explores when different fidelity levels can be applied and which levels are suitable for creating realistic use environments in medical technology evaluations. We used the PRETAR framework to determine the appropriate fidelity for each artefact based on study constraints, resources, ethical considerations, and data analysis methods. Using a case study of a sensorised glove for vaginal examinations, we developed artefacts with varying levels of fidelity to replicate the fetal head and birth canal to test whether mixed-fidelity prototypes can replicate clinical environments effectively while being cost- and time-efficient and critically examine each design suggestion, discussing the benefits and limitations of our decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition Technology & Work
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-025-00797-7
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using mixed-fidelity to create effective environments

Carmen Salvadores Fernandez, Dimitrios Siassakos, Ann Blandford, Manish Kumar Tiwari et al.
Cognition Technology & Work
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Using mixed-fidelity to create effective environments

Carmen Salvadores Fernandez, Dimitrios Siassakos, Ann Blandford, Manish Kumar Tiwari, Anna Louise David, Shireen Jaufuraully, Jeremy Opie, Adrien E. Desjardins, Lakchana Mahendran
article en

Abstract

Abstract User testing is crucial for ensuring that systems meet user expectations, involving both low- and high-fidelity prototypes. Recently, mixed-fidelity prototypes, which blend various levels of detail, have gained popularity but are mainly used for evaluating single digital prototypes. Typically, medical devices are tested only after engineering is complete, using high-fidelity prototypes in realistic environments. This paper explores when different fidelity levels can be applied and which levels are suitable for creating realistic use environments in medical technology evaluations. We used the PRETAR framework to determine the appropriate fidelity for each artefact based on study constraints, resources, ethical considerations, and data analysis methods. Using a case study of a sensorised glove for vaginal examinations, we developed artefacts with varying levels of fidelity to replicate the fetal head and birth canal to test whether mixed-fidelity prototypes can replicate clinical environments effectively while being cost- and time-efficient and critically examine each design suggestion, discussing the benefits and limitations of our decisions.

Cognition Technology & WorkVol. 27(1-2)
The London College (GB), University College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.