Democracy as symbol and as ideology: Lefort, Althusser, Poulantzas

This article develops an account of the ideological function of the democratic political scene in contemporary liberal democracies. It does so by confronting Claude Lefort's theory of democracy with a structuralist Marxist perspective. According to Lefort, democracies institutionalise a political scene that symbolically acknowledges that a society's future perpetually remains undecided. Despite this key insight, Lefort exclusive emphasis on the symbolic acknowledgement of contingency blocks us from distinguishing between meaningful conflict with tangible stakes and a limited, managed or market-conforming democracy. In contrast, Althusser and Poulantzas foreground the state's structural imperative to reproduce capitalist social relations. By taking into account both democracy's ‘show’ and its ‘machinery’, I argue that the meanings generated by the construction of the political scene are also always ideological: the symbolic acknowledgement of an open-ended future can serve as an ideological cover that dissimulates the reality of the reproduction of capitalist social relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thesis Eleven
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251331987
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democracy as symbol and as ideology: Lefort, Althusser, Poulantzas

Lorenzo Buti
Thesis Eleven
Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
article

Democracy as symbol and as ideology: Lefort, Althusser, Poulantzas

Lorenzo Buti
article en

Abstract

This article develops an account of the ideological function of the democratic political scene in contemporary liberal democracies. It does so by confronting Claude Lefort's theory of democracy with a structuralist Marxist perspective. According to Lefort, democracies institutionalise a political scene that symbolically acknowledges that a society's future perpetually remains undecided. Despite this key insight, Lefort exclusive emphasis on the symbolic acknowledgement of contingency blocks us from distinguishing between meaningful conflict with tangible stakes and a limited, managed or market-conforming democracy. In contrast, Althusser and Poulantzas foreground the state's structural imperative to reproduce capitalist social relations. By taking into account both democracy's ‘show’ and its ‘machinery’, I argue that the meanings generated by the construction of the political scene are also always ideological: the symbolic acknowledgement of an open-ended future can serve as an ideological cover that dissimulates the reality of the reproduction of capitalist social relations.

Thesis ElevenVol. 192(1)
KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.