Bridging business and biodiversity: An analysis of biodiversity assessment tools

Corporate sustainability management is an increasingly emerging topic. Consequently, it is important for businesses to evaluate the impact of their activities on biodiversity and develop strategies to reduce their negative biodiversity impacts. This paper analyses 45 biodiversity assessment tools, proposed by the Science Based Targets Network (SBTN), that can be used by companies. The tools were analysed for the following characteristics: methods used in the tools, biodiversity topics covered, pressure and state biodiversity aspects, skill requirements, accessibility, user interface, integration of a map, developer group and assessment scope, and then compared using multidimensional scaling (MDS) to identify (dis-)similarities of the tools. Using qualitative analysis and MDS, we identified six main groups: software and web applications for biodiversity assessment, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools, Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) analysis tools, Geographic Information System (GIS)-based tools, index calculation methods and biodiversity related data repositories. Furthermore, the biodiversity related indicators in the tools differ greatly by scope, data and evaluation method. In view of the variety of methodological approaches, this study helps businesses to get an overview to subsequently select suitable biodiversity assessment methods. The study also presents a case study on the application of the tools for a wood-processing company and proposes a generalised biodiversity assessment approach for extractive industries. Future research should further explore the limitations of these tools, particularly regarding their practical application by different industry sectors. In the course of further tool development, concrete instructions for action to improve the state of biodiversity should also be integrated in the tools. • 45 biodiversity assessment tools are analysed. • Use multidimensional scaling (MDS) for tool comparison. • Show the variety of methods and indicators for biodiversity assessment. • Implications for tool use are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100682
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging business and biodiversity: An analysis of biodiversity assessment tools

Lea Ranacher, Franziska Hesser, Tobias Stern, Kurt Christian Schuster et al.
5 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Economic and Environmental Valuation
15.66
article

Bridging business and biodiversity: An analysis of biodiversity assessment tools

Lea Ranacher, Franziska Hesser, Tobias Stern, Kurt Christian Schuster, Andreas Barth
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Corporate sustainability management is an increasingly emerging topic. Consequently, it is important for businesses to evaluate the impact of their activities on biodiversity and develop strategies to reduce their negative biodiversity impacts. This paper analyses 45 biodiversity assessment tools, proposed by the Science Based Targets Network (SBTN), that can be used by companies. The tools were analysed for the following characteristics: methods used in the tools, biodiversity topics covered, pressure and state biodiversity aspects, skill requirements, accessibility, user interface, integration of a map, developer group and assessment scope, and then compared using multidimensional scaling (MDS) to identify (dis-)similarities of the tools. Using qualitative analysis and MDS, we identified six main groups: software and web applications for biodiversity assessment, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools, Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) analysis tools, Geographic Information System (GIS)-based tools, index calculation methods and biodiversity related data repositories. Furthermore, the biodiversity related indicators in the tools differ greatly by scope, data and evaluation method. In view of the variety of methodological approaches, this study helps businesses to get an overview to subsequently select suitable biodiversity assessment methods. The study also presents a case study on the application of the tools for a wood-processing company and proposes a generalised biodiversity assessment approach for extractive industries. Future research should further explore the limitations of these tools, particularly regarding their practical application by different industry sectors. In the course of further tool development, concrete instructions for action to improve the state of biodiversity should also be integrated in the tools. • 45 biodiversity assessment tools are analysed. • Use multidimensional scaling (MDS) for tool comparison. • Show the variety of methods and indicators for biodiversity assessment. • Implications for tool use are discussed.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 26
Graz University of Technology (AT), Kompetenzzentrum Holz (AT), Lenzing (Austria) (AT), BOKU University (AT)
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
15.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.