Reconciling special treatment with the duty to prosecute serious human rights violations in Colombian transitional justice

On 24 November 2016, the Colombian government and FARC-EP signed a historic peace agreement, establishing the Comprehensive System for Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Recurrence. Central to this system is the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (SJP), which combines restorative justice mechanisms with judicial oversight. This article analyses whether the special treatment measures under the SJP —such as special and alternative sanctions, amnesties, and pardons— comply with Colombia’s obligations under the American Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to investigate and punish serious human rights violations. It examines the proportionality and enforceability of these measures, highlighting their potential to conflict with international duties if not properly implemented. While the SJP’s approach may facilitate peace, it must ensure that the System’s sanctions align with the gravity of crimes committed. This study underscores the need for Colombia’s transitional justice framework to uphold victims’ rights while adhering to international standards. Received: 10 May 2024 Accepted: 31 March 2025 Articles in Press: 15 April 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deusto Journal of Human Rights
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.3047
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Penology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciling special treatment with the duty to prosecute serious human rights violations in Colombian transitional justice

Fabián Raimondo
1 citations
Deusto Journal of Human Rights
Criminal Justice and Penology
15.98
article

Reconciling special treatment with the duty to prosecute serious human rights violations in Colombian transitional justice

Fabián Raimondo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

On 24 November 2016, the Colombian government and FARC-EP signed a historic peace agreement, establishing the Comprehensive System for Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Recurrence. Central to this system is the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (SJP), which combines restorative justice mechanisms with judicial oversight. This article analyses whether the special treatment measures under the SJP —such as special and alternative sanctions, amnesties, and pardons— comply with Colombia’s obligations under the American Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to investigate and punish serious human rights violations. It examines the proportionality and enforceability of these measures, highlighting their potential to conflict with international duties if not properly implemented. While the SJP’s approach may facilitate peace, it must ensure that the System’s sanctions align with the gravity of crimes committed. This study underscores the need for Colombia’s transitional justice framework to uphold victims’ rights while adhering to international standards. Received: 10 May 2024 Accepted: 31 March 2025 Articles in Press: 15 April 2025

Deusto Journal of Human Rights(15)
Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Penology
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.