Make it worth it: Effort-reward modulations on reinforcement-learning and prediction-error signaling across adolescence

Adolescence is characterized by significant shifts in effort allocation. A well-known neuro-economic framework suggests that rewards help overcome potential effort costs. However, few studies have examined the neurobiological mechanisms by which rewards and associated effort costs drive adolescent learning. This study utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging in a sample of adolescents (N = 146, 13-25 years) and employed a reinforcement-learning paradigm that manipulated effort and reward levels, by varying task demands and varying potential rewards. The analysis of trial-by-trial learning signals (reward prediction errors) and behavioral learning performance demonstrated that greater reward levels enhanced adolescent learning, especially when faced with greater effort demands. Moreover, this effect was more pronounced in those experiencing greater effort demands: younger adolescents and adolescents who place less value on effort for demanding tasks. Neuroimaging results revealed that the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) was a key region in signaling the interaction between reward and effort demands. That is, greater reward strengthened prediction error coding in the dACC, particularly under conditions of greater task demands, with these effects being more pronounced in younger adolescents and adolescents who place less value on effort for demanding tasks. These findings support a role for dACC in the engagement of cognitive control, especially in situations where more cognitive control would be beneficial despite its associated effort costs, such as in high-demanding learning situations. This comprehensive approach aims to inform strategies for supporting effort allocation in learning during this crucial developmental period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101559
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Make it worth it: Effort-reward modulations on reinforcement-learning and prediction-error signaling across adolescence

Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde, Anne‐Wil Kramer, Lydia Krabbendam, Hilde M. Huizenga et al.
4 citations
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
5.72
article

Make it worth it: Effort-reward modulations on reinforcement-learning and prediction-error signaling across adolescence

Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde, Anne‐Wil Kramer, Lydia Krabbendam, Hilde M. Huizenga, Jessica V. Schaaf
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Adolescence is characterized by significant shifts in effort allocation. A well-known neuro-economic framework suggests that rewards help overcome potential effort costs. However, few studies have examined the neurobiological mechanisms by which rewards and associated effort costs drive adolescent learning. This study utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging in a sample of adolescents (N = 146, 13-25 years) and employed a reinforcement-learning paradigm that manipulated effort and reward levels, by varying task demands and varying potential rewards. The analysis of trial-by-trial learning signals (reward prediction errors) and behavioral learning performance demonstrated that greater reward levels enhanced adolescent learning, especially when faced with greater effort demands. Moreover, this effect was more pronounced in those experiencing greater effort demands: younger adolescents and adolescents who place less value on effort for demanding tasks. Neuroimaging results revealed that the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) was a key region in signaling the interaction between reward and effort demands. That is, greater reward strengthened prediction error coding in the dACC, particularly under conditions of greater task demands, with these effects being more pronounced in younger adolescents and adolescents who place less value on effort for demanding tasks. These findings support a role for dACC in the engagement of cognitive control, especially in situations where more cognitive control would be beneficial despite its associated effort costs, such as in high-demanding learning situations. This comprehensive approach aims to inform strategies for supporting effort allocation in learning during this crucial developmental period.

Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceVol. 73
Leiden University (NL), Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
European Commission, Universiteit Leiden, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.